I understand that but how does that in any way shape or form bind the other teams in the league? And just how is Sergei going to enforce that contract over here? It might be possible but would it really be worth it?Originally posted by duffistuta
I believe this is a seperate thing - Sergei has some (all?) of his players on contract. As was said elsewhere, if you're going to put time and money into individuals then you want to protect your investment.
I'm guessing it doesn't, it binds the player direct and would leave him in breach of contract and open to subsequent action due to that. I.E. I, joe Schmoe, agree that by signing this contract I am contracted to Boston Red Legion for 3 years and may not play for any other team in the NXL, NPPL, or Millennium Series from 2005-2008.Originally posted by Baca Loco
I understand that but how does that in any way shape or form bind the other teams in the league?
In breach of a Russian contract you want to enforce in America against two kids who just want to play paintball? Still doesn't explain why Trauma wasn't playing their Foreign Legion boyz, IMHO.Originally posted by duffistuta
I'm guessing it doesn't, it binds the player direct and would leave him in breach of contract and open to subsequent action due to that. I.E. I, joe Schmoe, agree that by signing this contract I am contracted to Boston Red Legion for 3 years and may not play for any other team in the NXL, NPPL, or Millennium Series from 2005-2008.
If you can believe many TV-detective series there seems to be a lot of "Russian contracts" that are "enforced" in America. There seems to be a few in this part of the world also.Originally posted by Baca Loco
In breach of a Russian contract you want to enforce in America against two kids who just want to play paintball?
1. Yes, why not?Originally posted by Baca Loco
In breach of a Russian contract you want to enforce in America against two kids who just want to play paintball? Still doesn't explain why Trauma wasn't playing their Foreign Legion boyz, IMHO.
I think that Trauma did not want to antagonise a fellow franchise owner by playing 2 players who were still under contract elsewhere regardless of the fact that that contract would not be valid under US law. I am not sure it has anything to do with the Legion trying to enforce a Russian contract, merely that Trauma are recognising that contract in a way that US law would not.Originally posted by duffistuta
Or was the call made by Trauma?