You seem to think penalties should be fair to the person receiving them. This is silly - the whole point of penalties is that they are *NOT* fair. They need to be so UNFAIR that players make an active effort to not get penalties called against them.
It's not enough to just try and curtail playing on. The penalties should be so harsh that players don't even want to look like they're thinking about playing on.
You're argument seems to think that penalties shouldn't be as harsh if the infraction didn't impact the game - why not? Players are not allowed to play on. Period. What happens after the rule is broken is irrelevant. We should not, and there is no need to, coddle players who break the rules.
If a player doesn't think the penalty for breaking a rule is fair, then the rule is written correctly! Any rule where a player thinks the penalty is proportional to the crime IS A BAD RULE.
It's not enough to just try and curtail playing on. The penalties should be so harsh that players don't even want to look like they're thinking about playing on.
You're argument seems to think that penalties shouldn't be as harsh if the infraction didn't impact the game - why not? Players are not allowed to play on. Period. What happens after the rule is broken is irrelevant. We should not, and there is no need to, coddle players who break the rules.
If a player doesn't think the penalty for breaking a rule is fair, then the rule is written correctly! Any rule where a player thinks the penalty is proportional to the crime IS A BAD RULE.