A humble punter's opinion - please listen
And here in a nutshell have we the answer to all the pleads of "why on earth won't they make paintball a sport for chrissake"
you can imagine the feedback to BBC/Sky/ITV etc when they cut from a game of Dynasty vs RL to the in-studio pundits, who then "debate" in such a grownup manner. Me, I'd just hit the off button and laugh.
However even within the thread, the good ol' p8 faithful get a battering unbeknownst to them (probably because they are debating marker accuracy):
"was he there in Pittsburgh playing ?"
- neither were 95% of the forum users
"Has he ever played in a pro game?"
- neither have 95% of the forum users
Has he ever come over here and seen a Millennium?
- neither have 95% of the forum users. Well, ok if you include CC and AMS then bring this down to 75%, which is still a pretty generously high percentage. And those figures are only because of vicinity - if someone on an American board asked a similar question wrt NPPL then we can ride back up to at least 95%.
These are the people who are on this forum day in day out, talking about paint to barrel match, kit bags, how to fan a trigger, where to bling up your kit, and other riveting topics. From the above you can assume they are no-marks whose opinion doesn't count either.
The massive who refuse to type the language that they speak are still in a txt fest sumwere talking about who 2 talk 2 about da gun dat dey saw sum1 wif. blingfest 4 me sum day.
All in all a fairly amusing scenario when you compare it to other "public" forums on the web - it's good to regress and lurk in some childishness 4 a wile. The amount of threads that end based on the question/topic raised at the start can be counted on the fingers of Jeremy Beadle's bad hand. A veritable lesson in forking. It's all cool with me though, and please nobody ban me because I do find this genuinely fascinating.
And here in a nutshell have we the answer to all the pleads of "why on earth won't they make paintball a sport for chrissake"
you can imagine the feedback to BBC/Sky/ITV etc when they cut from a game of Dynasty vs RL to the in-studio pundits, who then "debate" in such a grownup manner. Me, I'd just hit the off button and laugh.
However even within the thread, the good ol' p8 faithful get a battering unbeknownst to them (probably because they are debating marker accuracy):
"was he there in Pittsburgh playing ?"
- neither were 95% of the forum users
"Has he ever played in a pro game?"
- neither have 95% of the forum users
Has he ever come over here and seen a Millennium?
- neither have 95% of the forum users. Well, ok if you include CC and AMS then bring this down to 75%, which is still a pretty generously high percentage. And those figures are only because of vicinity - if someone on an American board asked a similar question wrt NPPL then we can ride back up to at least 95%.
These are the people who are on this forum day in day out, talking about paint to barrel match, kit bags, how to fan a trigger, where to bling up your kit, and other riveting topics. From the above you can assume they are no-marks whose opinion doesn't count either.
The massive who refuse to type the language that they speak are still in a txt fest sumwere talking about who 2 talk 2 about da gun dat dey saw sum1 wif. blingfest 4 me sum day.
All in all a fairly amusing scenario when you compare it to other "public" forums on the web - it's good to regress and lurk in some childishness 4 a wile. The amount of threads that end based on the question/topic raised at the start can be counted on the fingers of Jeremy Beadle's bad hand. A veritable lesson in forking. It's all cool with me though, and please nobody ban me because I do find this genuinely fascinating.