Is there some kind of sig competition going on?

[Baca Loco]

Once more into the breach

Okay, kids. The only posts I want to see from here on out in this thread are posts either for or agin ( a little hillbilly talk for 26) Big Sig.

Vote NO if you'd like to see smaller and/or less elaborate sigs--or even no sigs at all.

Vote YES if you're perfectly happy with the status quo.

 

[TOOLE]

Any chance of a poll?

EDIT ADDED: If you can't follow simple directions what's the point of a poll?
The Fun Police

 

[QuackingPlums]

I think we just type no...

Didn't we agree on a standard size not so long ago?
The sigs just seem to have steadily grown again.

 

[John C]

My sig is black and white so it loads quicker!

EDIT ADDED: Did I stutter?
The Fun Police

 

[TOOLE]

Originally posted by QuackingPlums
I think we just type no...

Didn't we agree on a standard size not so long ago?
The sigs just seem to have steadily grown again.

Yes, and the standard maximum sig size was that of SAD, our sigs are exactlt the same size, as are most!

 

[H]

Its not really just a matter of over sized signature images, of which i think they should be no bigger than tooles. Its those who use a large image, in addition to lines and lines of waffle, more rubbishy pictures and dropdown boxes.

EDIT ADDED: So is that a yes or a no? Y'all are trying my patience.
The Fun Police

 

[Dark Warrior]

Yes nothing wrong with sigs as long as they are kept within a manageable size.
Note the size of all Red Heat sigs has been reduced by at least 60% (Max size>65Kb) to aid faster page loading for you non-broadband types

If you still register our signatures as the larger size then simutaneously press
CTRL & F5
to refresh your browser

ALL YOU HAD TO DO WAS ASK

 

[Collier]

No,

Shrink em all, cept for mine

Paul

308849 bytes

 

[L J]

no, make em simple small pictures

 

[suiter]

Failed to follow directions so now saying nope keep the same