Now I'm in trouble -- I get PGI only for TJ's editorials (well, steal it actually), but I did write an article for another equally good magazine (Paintball2xtremes) on this very topic. It's being published this month and next month in two parts, and since it's out, I'm not breaking any rules by telling you the jist of it. The reason I'm in trouble is I just came from another thread here that also happened to address the topic of an upcoming article of mine in the Jan or Feb issue.
I've used up my quota of "self-advertisement" space, apologies if such was inappropriate.
Paintball is not a gravity / extreme sport, nor is it a sport. It is barely a game. It is rare in the world as it has no parallels (even water polo has similar / like sports) and yet has three distinctly different but equipment sharing variations. "Pro's" are not pro's at all, but are unpaid (and I'm including the store clerk with the pony tail, no matter what the rumours are) amateurs with sponserships, and most novices are long time players sandbagging (as in playing at a lower level to win more). If you care, the title of the article is Paintball Is Not What You Think It Is.
Paintball is a "Super-sport". It has borrowed and evolved the best elements of computer single-shooters, childhood hide and seek, dual-sports like the biatholon, and martial sports. There are only a couple of "Super-sports" out there (tow-in surfing, sky-boarding, and BASE jumping), and arguably paintball accidentally became one (whereas the others were direct evolutions).
I could be wrong. I could also be fired as a writer, but the arguement is pretty strong. Now if only we can (and are allowed to) grow up,
Larry Janecka