Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

gun vs gun

spyder

my name should be B2k2
Oct 15, 2001
77
0
0
professional
nothing.com
i didnt say lcds sucked.when i said that i meant the elcds that you put on spyders (boo-yah).sure i bet the angel lcds are good but im not gonna pay 800 dollars for slightly better acuracy.I thought alot about getting a impulse,shocker,autococker,bushmaster and it always came down to one gun.sorry guys but ill stick to my SPYDER :cool: :D
 

Inferno

Paintball Addict
Don't Blame your Tool

I know of plenty of players with Spyders that have never broken a ball. I've also seen them shoot at a rate of fire that my Inferno Heat can only hope to. Unfortunately, however, I have not had the pleasure of shooting a Angel, so I can't comment on them.

I guess it just boils down to what Robbo said:

Don't blame your tool.
:p
 

matt bryant

Chill With Da Still
Oct 19, 2001
79
0
0
Visit site
I cant actually believe any1 is comparin a spyder to a cocker. If u r a punter then spyders r fine but if u actually wanna get above that level id look 4 a different gun. Unless u r gonna spend money on a spyder they r crap. The velocity on em changes after every f**kin shot and u cant shoot s**t with them. At least when u buy a cocker u know ur not gonna have to worry about upgradin it straight away.
 

Senior_D

New Member
Aug 29, 2001
29
0
0
London
Visit site
if you read the start of this post you would of REALISED it was about reliability based on the fewer parts(smaller probabillity something would go wrong). Someone already mensioned that a good example of this is the mag. Good gun, simple design. the cocker and the spyder were simpley examples( I could just as easilly used a mag and a shocker). Anyway, the velocity problem can be saughted out with a new spring.


:p :p :p :p :p

Do not question the Dave, the laws of life were never there to answerd