Hey, this thought just dawned on me recently. In 1 corner you have a coker.
I sweet gun, but has so many parts, and extra little things. Then lets say a spyder compact. A nice gun, not the most amazing gun in the world though. The spyder has less parts.(basically stricker, bolt, trigger, lpc, and asa).
Therefore less to go wrong, and as a result more reliable. Fair enough, the cocker 2000 comes with a reg, and maybe a better barrel.But i bet that most (if not all) people change there stock parts anyway. So you spend the cash on parts you don't want. With the not as cool spyder you could spend the extra cash on aftermarket accessories.
Basically what this comes down to is that you could spend £400 on a cocker2000 and £80 on a spyder compact2000, and for £380 you could have a spyder compact with a dye boomstick, aa vigalante, e-lcd frame(electro), and have a gun with less chance of prblems.
Please tell me what you think about this because I'm very interested to know what everyone thinks.
I sweet gun, but has so many parts, and extra little things. Then lets say a spyder compact. A nice gun, not the most amazing gun in the world though. The spyder has less parts.(basically stricker, bolt, trigger, lpc, and asa).
Therefore less to go wrong, and as a result more reliable. Fair enough, the cocker 2000 comes with a reg, and maybe a better barrel.But i bet that most (if not all) people change there stock parts anyway. So you spend the cash on parts you don't want. With the not as cool spyder you could spend the extra cash on aftermarket accessories.
Basically what this comes down to is that you could spend £400 on a cocker2000 and £80 on a spyder compact2000, and for £380 you could have a spyder compact with a dye boomstick, aa vigalante, e-lcd frame(electro), and have a gun with less chance of prblems.
Please tell me what you think about this because I'm very interested to know what everyone thinks.