So spoke about this with Robbo before he posted up, my first thoughts were the same, is this Jamie trying to pull a fast one in a very dangerous way?
Some quick investigation shows that PC 7216 Leanne Butler is a real, however the following then springs to mind.
Officers have read the thread and it is wholly inappropriate that the above males's details including his home address has been uploaded onto the site.
Whilst it may be considered inappropriate, as far as I am aware, the re-posting of information readily available in the public domain does not break any laws.
All these details need to be removed immediately and it is advisable that all conversations in relation to this issue are also removed
Again, as far as I am aware, the removal of any such information would require some form of order or warrant, to which, we have recieved none.
Officers are aware of the circumstances in relation to the items that were ordered and as it stands this is a civil debt and not a police matter.
Knowingly commiting acts to defraud other people is now a civil debt? Now according to
http://www.actionfraud.police.uk/ This would be incorrect.
Failure to do so may result in police offences and further action to be taken.
Now, ive moved this underneith. As if this is not a police matter as previously stated, why are they then making what could be perceived as "threats" that if this information is not removed, "further action" could be taken, surely this would then also fall under a civil matter no? I think this has been crafted in a very specific way to try and strongarm or muscle the removal of said information via intimidation rather than any real cause.
I trust that this will be the end of the incident and that you will be advising all the members who have commented in this thread.
I guess everyone can consider themselves advised. Advised as to what however? That the police want to get involved to help you guys get ripped off by fraudsters and scammers?
The saga continues....