Dynasty v Cocker accuracy

[Roland]

Accuracy is only one part of the equation.

I used to use a Sniper and it was definately the most accurate marker around and it had the longest range.

Because of this I bought an Eclipse Cocker and have been disappointed with the range and accuracy, maybe I am expecting too much of it and maybe other markers have closed the gap.

 

[D6]

Hello Roland

Originally posted by Roland
Accuracy is only one part of the equation.

I used to use a Sniper and it was definately the most accurate marker around and it had the longest range.

Because of this I bought an Eclipse Cocker and have been disappointed with the range and accuracy, maybe I am expecting too much of it and maybe other markers have closed the gap.

Would you like your Angel back then Roland? Its time i moved on-look at the sponsors below...(not the cider one)

 

[Hotpoint]

Originally posted by Roland
Accuracy is only one part of the equation.

I used to use a Sniper and it was definately the most accurate marker around and it had the longest range.

With Robbo elsewhere and Manike yet to step in I must point out that a paintball will always go the same distance if fired at the same velocity no matter what Marker you use

Yes Baca it is "all about the physics"

 

[Flash-Bugout]

Physics?

Mumbo-Jumbo more like.

I make my marker more accurate by using a special lube I brew from the secretions of the bluebell, collected at exactly midnight - amazing properties it has.

Just keep that "science" away from me. It's not normal stuff that stuff!

 

[Philip]

Originally posted by Flash-Bugout
Physics?

Mumbo-Jumbo more like.

I make my marker more accurate by using a special lube I brew from the secretions of the bluebell, collected at exactly midnight - amazing properties it has.

Just keep that "science" away from me. It's not normal stuff that stuff!

But your not a normal guy

 

[Buddha 3]

Er..people, please read Jim's post again. I doubt he's saying Cockers are more accurate than Angels, or th eother way round. He's being sarcastic, and is basically saying the whole debate is just a bunh of BS.

 

[Hotpoint]

Originally posted by Flash-Bugout
Physics?

Mumbo-Jumbo more like.

Given your girlfriend actually has a Degree in Physics I'd watch yourself with talk like that

 

[Hotpoint]

Originally posted by Buddha 3
Er..people, please read Jim's post again. I doubt he's saying Cockers are more accurate than Angels, or th eother way round. He's being sarcastic, and is basically saying the whole debate is just a bunh of BS.

True but I couldn't leave Rolands post about range uncommented upon. More range???? Isaac Newton must be spinning in his grave like a centrifuge

 

[Buddha 3]

Originally posted by Hotpoint


True but I couldn't leave Rolands post about range uncommented upon. More range???? Isaac Newton must be spinning in his grave like a centrifuge

Agreed. My remark was more towards those who responded to the original message.

 

[Baca Loco]

Nick

Originally posted by Nick Iuel-Brockdorff
I don't believe you are trying to make the point that every marker is the same ?
Nick

Actually just the opposite while prodding our science geek pals. I have however truly enjoyed the extended threads on the "science" involved with all the poor saps involved bludgeoned unmercifully by the physics arguement which I find correct but insufficient for the real world.

Hotpoint--you're positively Pavlovian, my friend.

And speaking of dogs, do you hear the baying in the background? Can Robo be far behind?