....and i would add that I totally agree with testing of all brands. As to who would do it, theres a tough one, as someone (independant of paintball?) would need to be paid for designing and implementing a testing process and this would need to be repeated regularly as formulae vary from batch to batch. Then, what would stop 'Company X' sending a batch for testing that doesn't contain a staining/stripping compound yet producing a batch that does? Most companies outside of paintball take complaints re their products seriously and are interested in improving their products. Why should that be different with paint manufacturers? I should have thought they would be more interested in taking on board players comments and improving their fill to minimise damage rather than blanking complaints with 'no not interested' or 'dont name my paint' . Why do we as ballers generally feel it necessary to vaguely talk around the subject rather than state facts and name names as we have experienced them? And when we do why aren't complaints taken seriously instead of the ensuing slanging match?