If you can't move the player, move the bunker!Nick Brockdorff said:Paris last year, I played a whole game against the Tontons, with a goggle hit I received on the breakout - I just leaned my head against the dorito, posted a lane, and stayed there... now in that instance, it was just the ref being an ass, not reacting to the crowd screaming for 7 minutes to get me out.... and not noticing I was playing "funny"..... but under your rules, even if he suspected I was hit, there would be nothing he could do about it!
Nick, I've already pointed out why using neutral calls is undesirable. You've pointed out what can happen when we can't or don't use neutral calls, and I've already said I agree that's the down side of no neutral calls. So IMO the ball's back in your court. How should we apply neutral calls and is the price we would pay for such calls worth it?Nick Brockdorff said:Steve - if you say that as a head ref (and what is "touch significantly" anyway???) - you are just ASKING for trouble.
Once you remove the refs possibility of making a neutral call, while not being allowed to touch the player... you are effectively telling me - the player - that as long as I tug the hit up against the bunker, I can happily go on cheating for as long as I like, and there is not a damn thing you can do about it.
Paris last year, I played a whole game against the Tontons, with a goggle hit I received on the breakout - I just leaned my head against the dorito, posted a lane, and stayed there... now in that instance, it was just the ref being an ass, not reacting to the crowd screaming for 7 minutes to get me out.... and not noticing I was playing "funny"..... but under your rules, even if he suspected I was hit, there would be nothing he could do about it!
That is also interrence SteveI think Chi is right: we can (and I usually do) press in the obstacle if I'm looking for a hit. Usually it's too late by that time however.
AMEN !Chicago said:There are too many players not getting penalized as it is, this rule increases it a little so we can actually get our moneys worth of paintball for a weekend as we are a customer.
Cause, you know, your ass was hit and still playing, maybe the CUSTOMERS you are playing against would like their money's worth and would like the refs to do something about the fact you're not following the rules.
So how exactly did you instruct them before NES this past weekend in Varberg?Wadidiz said:I do agree, however, that refs should not significantly touch players nor interfere in any way. I have seen and heard of many instances of refs pushing or pulling players into hits--and that dog don't hunt. In my ref training I always instruct refs not to man-handle players.
That depends on the situation - just like it were beforeHow do you think a neutral call should be applied? Freeze the field or not?
Would you rather let the player continue playing with a hit, than messing with the players "timing" ?Showing the exact position of a snake player by standing her up offers a major advantage to that player's opponents--in many situation. It also interferes with the snake player's timing
Either that - or ACCEPT that a ref can NEVER touch a player or move a bunker to perform a check - it has to be either/or in my view.Is the hassles neutral calls make worth it?