What is 'Love' anyway?

[Missy-Q]

I have given my opinion on the question and just stated my views on love. If you feel the need to bash someone can i recommend somewhere else. Strangely i can pick up on sarcasm at my "youthful" age of 17, i also have stated these are my views and mine alone as well as the fact i believe i said i realise i don't know it all. You want to bash me feel free through pm's but taking the piss just for a laugh?
I'm not laughing to be honest.
Rant done.

CK

I was totally taking it easy on you to be honest. I wouldn't dream of bashing you through PM's. Where's the fun in that? I do find it amusing that a definitive 'hard-case' such as Jay, finds himself trying to qualify 'true love' with a bunch of teen-angst victims. That's funny to me.

Stress less, my friend.

There is no need to get so worked up over a thread that uses a title of a Howard Jones song as its subject.

I assure you I am neither stressed, nor worked up, in the slightest.

 

[Buddha 3]

I do find it amusing that a definitive 'hard-case' such as Jay, finds himself trying to qualify 'true love' with a bunch of teen-angst victims..

I laughed.

 

[Robbo]

I do find it amusing that a definitive 'hard-case' such as Jay, finds himself trying to qualify 'true love' with a bunch of teen-angst victims. That's funny to me.
.

I don't think Jay needs anybody to qualify anything he might say Missy, with hands the size of his, any lack of qualification must always be in the mind of the beholder.

 

[Tony Harrison]

 

[pablo666]

I was totally taking it easy on you to be honest. I wouldn't dream of bashing you through PM's. Where's the fun in that? I do find it amusing that a definitive 'hard-case' such as Jay, finds himself trying to qualify 'true love' with a bunch of teen-angst victims. That's funny to me.

I assure you I am neither stressed, nor worked up, in the slightest.

To be perfectly honest i doubt i've seen anything as pathetic as this.

1. You don't know me nor have ever met me, therefore why you choose to take the piss is beyond me.
2. "Taking it easy" on me? What was the need to do it in the first place?
3. Do you find yourself only trying to get a laugh through a forum where you feel the need to compensate for an obviously massive ego? As well as the fact no-one actually finds you in the slightest bit amusing in the first place?
4. This is not some "cocky" teen talking to you to be honest, if you can't have a structured conversation on a topical subject such as this with a 17 year old, i doubt you have mentally hit 4.
5. You have hardly made a contribution to the topic, instead you choose to nit pick other peoples topics. Why not come up with something sensible, instead of trying to make people laugh because you can;t actually give a decent answer to the question in hand?

 

[Seany]

3. Do you find yourself only trying to get a laugh through a forum where you feel the need to compensate for an obviously massive ego? As well as the fact no-one actually finds you in the slightest bit amusing in the first place?

I do.

 

[Missy-Q]

To be perfectly honest i doubt i've seen anything as pathetic as this.

1. You don't know me nor have ever met me, therefore why you choose to take the piss is beyond me.

Apparently so.

2. "Taking it easy" on me? What was the need to do it in the first place?

Same reason I'm taking it easy on you now. I think your post was totally naff, and I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about, but I don't/didn't want to needlessly embarrass you. I got far more pleasure in directing your banal, ill-informed tosh towards Buddha, and happily imagined him squirming over the need to form a manly reply that was both polite and helpful, as is his way.

3. Do you find yourself only trying to get a laugh through a forum where you feel the need to compensate for an obviously massive ego? As well as the fact no-one actually finds you in the slightest bit amusing in the first place?

Seems you have some dissent on this one, however, you're right of course. I feel the need to compensate for my obviously massive ego, and the only way I can do this is by poking fun at a 17yr old know-it-all punk. Busted.

4. This is not some "cocky" teen talking to you to be honest, if you can't have a structured conversation on a topical subject such as this with a 17 year old, i doubt you have mentally hit 4.

Topical? Don't make me laugh.
You consider other peoples conversations you've listened to as 'life experience', and believe this enables you to both qualify what 'love' is (ridiculous) and also to help middle-aged (being kind to a few here) married men to understand their own emotions. If you're not a cocky teen then you do a pretty good impression of one.

5. You have hardly made a contribution to the topic, instead you choose to nit pick other peoples topics. Why not come up with something sensible, instead of trying to make people laugh because you can;t actually give a decent answer to the question in hand?

On the contrary, I have made several contributions. You didn't like them, obviously, but that doesn't make them any less valid than your own sage-like posts.

Listen, if you want to have a row, I'm definitely game, but I won't be holding anything back, so I'll let you decide for yourself if you think it's a good idea or not.

 

[Robbo]

Ouch !

Pablo, I'm probably one of the oldest, if not the oldest guy on these boards, and as such, I have a shed load of life experiences;
And all of these experiences are straining at the seams in trying to convince you to decline Missy's offer of a slow, extremely painful death.

 

[pablo666]

Apparently so.


Same reason I'm taking it easy on you now. I think your post was totally naff, and I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about, but I don't/didn't want to needlessly embarrass you. I got far more pleasure in directing your banal, ill-informed tosh towards Buddha, and happily imagined him squirming over the need to form a manly reply that was both polite and helpful, as is his way.


Seems you have some dissent on this one, however, you're right of course. I feel the need to compensate for my obviously massive ego, and the only way I can do this is by poking fun at a 17yr old know-it-all punk. Busted.

Topical? Don't make me laugh.
You consider other peoples conversations you've listened to as 'life experience', and believe this enables you to both qualify what 'love' is (ridiculous) and also to help middle-aged (being kind to a few here) married men to understand their own emotions. If you're not a cocky teen then you do a pretty good impression of one.



On the contrary, I have made several contributions. You didn't like them, obviously, but that doesn't make them any less valid than your own sage-like posts.

Listen, if you want to have a row, I'm definitely game, but I won't be holding anything back, so I'll let you decide for yourself if you think it's a good idea or not.

To be honest, i'm game as well. You have a problem with my post? Keep it to yourself. I posted my opinion, at no point did i state this was the answer, i simply gave my opinion and asked others their opinions. Find me a quote where i stated that i am physically correct and all other answers are wrong please.

Another point, in no way have i stated i "know it all". This is one subject and one alone, therefore how that makes ME believe i know everything i am unsure, i know some things about stuff. This topic i simply stated my views, yet you do seem to enjoy "poking fun at a 17yr old know-it-all punk" as otherwise, you would not have bothered becoming so sarcastic. You seem to yourself believe you know it all and that everything else others post is inferior, try not to post and be so contemptuous about other views.

"and believe this enables you to both qualify what 'love' is (ridiculous) and also to help middle-aged (being kind to a few here) married men to understand their own emotions." Another point, at no point did i state i was giving a correct answer, neither did i suggest that i am trying to help middle aged men i.e James who is also 17 understand their emotions, this would be pointless as you have kindly pointed out, i am 17 and gladly admit that i do not fully understand this emotion, how can i at my age?

At least half you're contribution related to nowt on the subject, instead you choose to comment other people's views.

And to be honest you call me cocky? "Listen, if you want to have a row, I'm definitely game, but I won't be holding anything back, so I'll let you decide for yourself if you think it's a good idea or not."

Enough said.

 

[Robbo]

Fight !!!!!​