Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

Joy Withdraw from the NPPL after San Diego

Cusack

Well-Known Member
Oct 17, 2005
1,155
2
63
Well im confused. Are you saying SP are paying off the refs or do the refs hate Angels?

because there can't be any other reason! ;)
 

Tom Allen

TFP
Jul 4, 2003
8,196
123
148
Cardiff
There may be a little bit of anti wdp/uk sentiment after wdp whooped tart parts in the courts. How this would show it's ugly head is pure speculation, but it wouldn't suprise me if it showed in the most obvious place.
 

Panthro

LEGO 4 Life
Dec 30, 2005
374
30
48
Bristol
The same go for dye then?

wasn't the settlement between the 3 companies leading to the rail and A1 being produced?
 

Chicago

New Member
Jan 31, 2005
1,380
0
0
Visit site
So I finally read this. All I can say is just .... wow. Did I read correctly that Shawn Walker just said, in writing, that the NPPL reffing is horrible?

The rationalization here is that the reffing isn't any worse than last year, and they improved other things?

Maybe I missed it.


What has NPPL improved over last year?

The turf is better, and.....?


I just can't fathom that anyone would think it was acceptable to KNOW that you did not have proper officiating, and not IMMEDIATELY do something rectify that situation. Teams are paying entry fees to play a tournament. That means you are obligated to provide fields, obstacles, netting, air, judges, a schedule, some method of scoring, and paint or the ability to bring your own. That's what running a tournament is. If any one of those things is not sufficient, they need to be addressed as an immediate, #1 priority.


But we have here an email which states that the league management is aware that the reffing is bad, but because 'reffing is hard', has been happy to take everyone's entry fees while not doing anything about it.