No, far from simple, and a decent option might have been "all of the above".\I suppose like a lot of things Missy, the answer is not a simple one and is more likely to be a multiplicity of reasons.
I agree the average playing age is most definitely younger now than when we did our thing but that doesn't explain everything in my view.
I think the money coming into our sport is most definitely a factor, especially when it was routed toward the pro scene.
That in itself created a sub class of *******s that unfortunately became a template for the young tourney player to aspire to......hmmmmm.....the more I think about it the more I am convinced it's not nostalgia and maybes it was better then and my reason for suggesting this is because the average player then was more content with his or her lot.
If you take a quick look at any paintball forum anywhere, someone is bitching about something.
Hmmmm.......
I agree with you about the leagues 'creating a monster' with the Pro teams, and the trickle-down effect that is tainting the player-base. There can be no argument about that. I would say though, that the 'men' in the game seem to be currently gravitating towards the booming scenario market. Thats where you find the atmostphere these days, and the mature client. It comes to something when the 'weirdo's' represent the industries healthiest facet. Time to re-evaluate. If people throw money at supporting the Scenario teams I wonder if they too would turn into complete knobs? Who knows....