Robbo, you asked about Sup'Air. You know the answer to this and and i know where you're coming from, since we had this conversation by PM about 18 months back. But i'll state it here since that's what you want me to do:
made in tourney paintball. I was offered a year off my normal duties to 'go off and arrange it'. I thought about it for one evening then said 'Not interested'. Why is simple. Look at the hate and suspicion that comes our way from the rest of UK paintball. If i had arranged this there is no way it would have been welcomed by UK paintball. We would have been seen as a threat or at least that this was some plot to take over or destroy the tourney scene. Can you imagine the opposition that would have come my way! Much in the same way as DF were refused entry to the UKPSF because the members didn't want us in their club.
Having played tourney, and having got to know quite a few people in UK ball, i am of the opinion the the hierarchy behind it sucks*. Too much backstabbing goes on and the politics- Jeez, they make me sick! There's too much division and hate guys. Instead of looking at ways to bring others down, we should be looking at the good bits everyone has to offer and working together for the good of the game. IMO the politics is what stifles our game, not the fact that DF don't offer Sup'Air facilities!
EDIT: * Not a reference to you personally Robbo, before you get all 'Grrrrr' with me again
Actually I didn't know the answer to my question and maybe you did tell me before but the fact it was 18 months ago and not minutes may account for me not remembering
I don't hold or expect df to be responsible for any development of our sport, no more than any other site owner in the UK, all they (and most else) are interested in is squeezing the maximum amount of cash (note the word cash) from punters and running to the bank with it all, well some of it anyway.
I'm afraid I just don't believe the figures being presented by yourself, and I don't think these figures from you are deliberately misleading, I just think you have been fed them.
Some of them are true but in my opinion, not all.
If you aren't being fed them and they are valid, then somebody is making sooooooo much money it defies belief, and before you say anything regarding my ability to do maths, to have never owned a site or have no idea of site expenditure, I can own up to being reasonably adept at mathematics, once owning a site (Sittingbourne) and also quite aware of site expenditure.
Owning and running a site isn't rocket science Gups, it's quite easy, nothing too intellectual going on at all.
It's an attractive business to get into because of the cash nature and as is generally acknowledged, for the most part, attracts a certain 'type'.
Very few sites are run professionally but a lot of sites make money, sound like a contradiction?
If it does, then you really don't understand what i am saying
As for your appraisal of paintball's hierarchy over here sucking, well you won't get no arguments from me on that one gal but I am afraid politics is merely just another obstacle you have to get over.
If you really want something in this sport then you have to go for it regardless.
People are easily put off if they wanan be put off, Laurent wanted to change the face of paintball by bringing in Sup Air when the whole of paintball was set up differently and against him......he went for it......the rest is history.
I think I'll butt out of this now anyway because a lot of this talk is academic because we haven't got verifiable facts and figures to refer to, all we got is hearsay and bull as far as I am concerned and I don't think we will ever get reliable figures for obvious reasons and perhaps that hints at one of our very real problems within our site ownership demographic.
Have a good new year Gups !