Gtek 160r vs 3.5 what will be the best buy?

[Muxas]

Hey people, i want to buy another marker but im between gtek 160r or geo 3.5... I had the 3.1 with iv core bolt and i enjoy it, but I've been listening good things about the new bolt from gtek

 

[GRIMLOCK]

I personally think the Gtek bolt system is better than the iv core but it is entirely preference on the aesthetic/"feel" of the marker.

Tool less bolt is nice on the iv core but you just don't need to maintain the gamma core, it will shoot at any cost by design....

 

[Trolley]

I'm in the same boat currently, £450ish on a used geo 3.5 or £800ish for a 160r with added pops.

 

[STONESOLDIER]

I can confirm the Gamma Core is better than the IV Core

 

[Trolley]

Value wise which way would you go?

 

[Muxas]

I personally think the Gtek bolt system is better than the iv core but it is entirely preference on the aesthetic/"feel" of the marker.

Tool less bolt is nice on the iv core but you just don't need to maintain the gamma core, it will shoot at any cost by design....

Gtek 160r have also tool less bolt sistem, and have also upgrade the air intake... Ok ok

 

[GRIMLOCK]

Gtek 160r have also tool less bolt sistem

Did not know that

 

[Trolley]

Why isn't the gamma in the cspro?

I can confirm the Gamma Core is better than the IV Core

 

[STONESOLDIER]

Because its a CS marker and not a Gtek

 

[Trolley]

Will the gamma make it into your top end markers?