Gtek 160r vs 3.5 what will be the best buy?

[STONESOLDIER]

No, because we would have to re-design the CS to make the Gamma core fit, I imagine it will come out in our next line of markers.

When ever that is.

 

[Mike Coyne]

Go this same predicament atm, prob looking at the 160R due to the gamma core's reliability, extra bit of saving up and the gamma core is where im leaning atm.

 

[Trolley]

I went with the 3.5 and it's sweet as

 

[Jamiehill]

Is the gtek 160r worth getting or spending abit more to get a lv1 or something like that

 

[Mark Sheredy]

I've owned the 160R and a GSL. For the money, the 160R is absolutely the best mid-ranged marker out there. But you are comparing a high end marker to a mid-rage, and the 3.5 would hands down be my pick for the same amount of cash. The 3.5 can compete with any new marker out there.

 

[Sb123]

3.5