Yup, am with you, but for me the flaw is that the hour hand isn't discrete - it doesn't move in one 'chunk' from minute 47 (say) to minute 48. It moves continuously, like the minute hand, so because the hour hand can occupy any point, there are (at any point) two positions the minute hand can be that are at right angles to it. But if you're right - if the minute hand does move discretely from position to position, then I agree with you.The hour hand moves between the minute positions but the minute hand will only be at 90 degrees to it twice per cycle. As the hour hand moves between the individual minute positions the minute hand will be sweeping around so only makes the two right angles once per sweep. At other times in its sweep it wont be at 90 degrees but the hour hand will still be moving between the minute marks. That's the logic I have gone for.
I'm gonna go for 5.25 as many rectangles as squaresYup, am with you, but for me the flaw is that the hour hand isn't discrete - it doesn't move in one 'chunk' from minute 47 (say) to minute 48. It moves continuously, like the minute hand, so because the hour hand can occupy any point, there are (at any point) two positions the minute hand can be that are at right angles to it. But if you're right - if the minute hand does move discretely from position to position, then I agree with you.
How about: by what factor is the number of rectangles on a chessboard larger than the number of squares?