Ok. After a horrible, wet day I've just managed to read all the posts.
So to answer a few points to the above as Im not happy having my name or company being targeted for more ****.
With hindsight I should have four time to check what Tint ha dsaid to me, honestly I didn't think someone would twist or make up a story like that or twist what was piste up. That error was my fault so i apologise to all and any that have been offended by me allowing Him on site.
But, on Saturday where he was working he was always within line of site of me or my staff who kept an eye on him.
When I reloaded things had transpired the way they had last night I told Tiny he was not allowed in the stagging areas so he was limited to the public side if the field, thus limiting any options for thieving.
My main concern with this is what he has done is in now way excusable within the bounds of decent behaviour. But if we go down the route of out and out bans for thieving etc where do we draw the line. We cannot vet everyone of our customers, we can limit access to areas where kit is etc which we would do to protect our customers interests.
I hope this makes sense, I sit here written it on a smashed I phone, exhausted and sitting contemplating a lot of stuff right now so hopefully what ice said will not be taken out of context.
We do not welcome the behaviour previously shown by tiny, and as the masses have voiced there opinions already I can't see him coming to events really knowing that nobody trusts him or wants him there.
Did that on Saturday. Just an update on the Tom Vs Joe Bollard scenario. Joe asked Tom today whether he would get his parts back that he stole, to which he responded "maybe". I went to have a "friendly" word with him about where the parts are and he argued it was "only a rail" as though it was ok. He has said he would bring it down next time - unfortunately I won't be there to check but I really hope I don't need to go and collect it from his.
