Not true. People would still go to walk ons etc once month as they would normally. It just means they can play more often, and they are buying balls etc from the retailers. Doing it this way is just about affording to play more and get better so want to play even more and then enter compsLet's say theoretically renegade paintball is 100% safe. You're safe, public is safe, cut the rubbish and just say it's fine.
You're still taking money away from paintball site owners who have overheads to cover and mouths to feed. If you want to support the sport, you need to use your local site.
If you're strapped for cash, as has been said, there are plenty of options for the more budget side of things if you have your own kit. And if you play regularly without your own kit and rent it all, then that's your tough luck and you'll have to pay the expensive side of things.
Also, having read your post more in depth, this discussion is NOT about me, as I said in the first post I read about it on uk scenario. There is no need to get all personal mate it is just a debateLet's say theoretically renegade paintball is 100% safe. You're safe, public is safe, cut the rubbish and just say it's fine.
You're still taking money away from paintball site owners who have overheads to cover and mouths to feed. If you want to support the sport, you need to use your local site.
If you're strapped for cash, as has been said, there are plenty of options for the more budget side of things if you have your own kit. And if you play regularly without your own kit and rent it all, then that's your tough luck and you'll have to pay the expensive side of things.
In general, our site owners would sell thier grandmothers to shave a tenth of a penny off a paintball and so I'm not so sure appealing to people's philanthropic sides is gonna prove that succesful .. the main consideration in this instance is and has to be safety, and not the financial welfare of our site owners ... they do very well thankyou and for the most part, put bugger all back into the sport .. it all goes into their back pocket .. and stays there.Let's say theoretically renegade paintball is 100% safe. You're safe, public is safe, cut the rubbish and just say it's fine.
You're still taking money away from paintball site owners who have overheads to cover and mouths to feed. If you want to support the sport, you need to use your local site.
If you're strapped for cash, as has been said, there are plenty of options for the more budget side of things if you have your own kit. And if you play regularly without your own kit and rent it all, then that's your tough luck and you'll have to pay the expensive side of things.
Could then say a group of 20 people not get insurance and split the cost thus becoming like an annual fee? This (basing it in what I pay for insurance) would still be cheaper than playing more on sites more often.It can be safely done, but never a federation will agree with it for a really easy reason:
If there is an accident (or not an accident ...), nothing will cover you. Insurance doesn't care about nets, mask or anything.
Please note this is as part of the debate, not targeted to you personally.
Could then say a group of 20 people not get insurance and split the cost thus becoming like an annual fee? This (basing it in what I pay for insurance) would still be cheaper than playing more on sites more often.
Probably not - what insurance do you have?
In very basic terms there are two types of insurance in paintball:
The individuals insurance - covering your own loss of earnings etc should you have an accident, and covering your liability should you injure someone. e.g life insurance / sports insurance.
UKPSF membership includes such insurance but covers you only at approved sites that meet UKPSF criteria (This criteria includes safety measues and the venue having appropriate insurance)
The venues insurance - this covers the venue for liabilities, and to get this type of insurance the venue will need the appropriate measures and procedures to reduce the need.