Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

WC 2010: England v USA

Tony Harrison

What is your beef with the Mac?
Mar 13, 2007
6,516
1,874
238
I'm no football pundit, but wasn't England's performance disappointing?

And while I'm on the subject of England v USA, what would be the chances of getting an all-star UK team together to play a US event, to try and reclaim some of our glory days?

(Pretty slim, I know, but it's nice to dream)
 

Robbo

Owner of this website
Jul 5, 2001
13,116
2,157
448
London
www.p8ntballer.com
Sucks to be a keeper eh?

What makes me wanna heave more than Green's 'I can't believe it's not butter' coated fingers is
pundits on the radio and TV after the game; these guys are supposed to be 'experts'.

If they are, then football has some of the dumbest experts that's ever been known to stand on two feet and describe themselves as homosapiens [obviously Arsenal supporters are a subclass of that species :)].

It's truly embarrassing just how unsophisticated and irrational our expert analysis has become....... and yet, football, believe it or not, is actually quite similar to paintball.
They both have a tactical/technical ratio aspect to their games that is similar in terms of magnitude.

I don't care which expert you listen to, the drivel that comes out of his mouth when analysing any particular game is mind-numbing ... but hey, it gives people something to listen to on TalkSport I suppose.

It is the nature of experts everywhere in sport to ponder the mysteries of the unknown, and to an extent, the tactical side of any game is always gonna be less well known than the technical.
The tactical is more akin to art than it is to science and thus, easier to explore with bullsh!t as the underpinning rationale rather than logic.

If you need proof of this, and I mean real, undeniable, in-yer-face, bone-crushingly obvious proof, then just listen to Graham Taylor ... and this turnip head was actually an England manager at one time ... says it all I think.

The whole notion of a sophisticated football expert is just another case of the Emperor's New Clothes ..... we've all been duped. ...... and the irony is?
I still fackin listen to TalkSport every day :rolleyes:
 

Dskize

I Would
Dec 6, 2004
4,341
300
118
50
Duntryin
You do ? me too, and I'm Scottish so it's 20 times worse for me .

The thing is that I'm not actually anti-English but I am very anti English press ,they spend the build up to the world cup trying to **** over everybody involved in the England team then their giving out free flags with every issue ,bull****, Talk sport is one of the most xenophobic radio stations I've ever listened too but as I have no interest in Scottish football (I mean why would you be, really) it's still the best station for the premiership.

And Mike Parry cracks me up.
 

Banil

Fe
Dec 29, 2007
1,009
245
98
1966 England draw first game in the world cup then go onto win it.
1990 England draw first game and end up in the semi's.

Still have faith
 

Thib

Well-Known Member
Nov 26, 2008
506
40
53
37
Newcastle
Sucks to be a keeper eh?

What makes me wanna heave more than Green's 'I can't believe it's not butter' coated fingers is
pundits on the radio and TV after the game; these guys are supposed to be 'experts'.

If they are, then football has some of the dumbest experts that's ever been known to stand on two feet and describe themselves as homosapiens [obviously Arsenal supporters are a subclass of that species :)].

It's truly embarrassing just how unsophisticated and irrational our expert analysis has become....... and yet, football, believe it or not, is actually quite similar to paintball.
They both have a tactical/technical ratio aspect to their games that is similar in terms of magnitude.

I don't care which expert you listen to, the drivel that comes out of his mouth when analysing any particular game is mind-numbing ... but hey, it gives people something to listen to on TalkSport I suppose.

It is the nature of experts everywhere in sport to ponder the mysteries of the unknown, and to an extent, the tactical side of any game is always gonna be less well known than the technical.
The tactical is more akin to art than it is to science and thus, easier to explore with bullsh!t as the underpinning rationale rather than logic.

If you need proof of this, and I mean real, undeniable, in-yer-face, bone-crushingly obvious proof, then just listen to Graham Taylor ... and this turnip head was actually an England manager at one time ... says it all I think.

The whole notion of a sophisticated football expert is just another case of the Emperor's New Clothes ..... we've all been duped. ...... and the irony is?
I still fackin listen to TalkSport every day :rolleyes:
I'm glad I never heard of talksport (it's maybe because I do support Arsenal frenchies... euuuh I meant gunners. :D)

But I'm not really impressed with any football expert or commentator (not only in england, french aren't better). They "are always right", they always disagree with decision so it's easy to say "I told you it was wrong to....."
They don't speak about a sport, they are turning it into a "people magazines", speaking about who did have sex with who, ... who cares ?
 

outkastmike

CUMBRIA
Jan 26, 2004
1,683
322
118
55
Cumbria
facebook.com
What did you expect last night,it's England playing after all,we have a long proud history of blowing it in major competitions from silly errors.

Silly sending off's,bad goal keeping,fluke goals,terrible substitutions............and we can't win penalty shootouts for toffee.