Originally posted by dr.strangelove
Not afraid of any bitch slapping, just don't like arguing the same points and being talked down to simply because my opinion doesn't line up with that of a person who designs them and the people who would rather take somebody else's word for it than forumlate their own opinion.
I'm sorry if you think I talk down to you.
As for other people. I am sure they are allowed to make their own opinions just like you do yourself.
Only they don't get quite so upset, about others opinions and when the facts are pointed out, as you do.
I'd love to get into a technical discussion about design points and issues with you/anyone, but I'm concerned that you are predetermined in your opinions, and would probably accuse me of being condescending again, so it wouldn't be a very open minded discussion, and I guess thus there is no point.
I have no problem discussing the shortcomings of the Intimidator guns and ways to improve them.
If you would like to start a discussion in the techroom and point out what you think are the design faults I'd be happy to discuss them. I know Bob and I are always looking for ways to make the gun better and to make more people want to buy one.
Arguing opinions is useless, arguing/discussing facts is a different thing.
Charlie, you are talking about the Nova, it worked with an articulating barrel system and was a very interesting functional design, but Mike Woods has a nightmare making anything visually pleasing. Everything Mike makes, has worked great, but looked aweful.
There are some absolute classic guns on vintagerex.
Man I loved the Golden Eagle when it first came out! I still remember the first time I shot one and the first game I played with one.
Heck I remember the first game I played with a semi, it was an autococker that would work for a game, not for the next, ad infinitum...
