matski said:
That is not implied at all, giving non-exclusive exemptions is not the same as "joining forces" to conquer the globe.
OK joining forces is the wrong phrase, but essentially this agreement gives those three companies a huge advantage over their competitors.
A non-exclusive license just permits the original holders of the patent to license it to third parties if they so wish? Is that correct?
If so this means they are now free to pursue smaller companies who are have been using their intellectual property for years.
The reason this whole situation started was beacuse Smart Parts were trying to enforce one of their dodgy patents, now a legal precedent has been set, and the claim of ownership by all three companies has been reinforced.
Surely this paves the way for more court cases and more costs per unit for the other companies who produce paintball guns? Because In my opinion we dont need that.
NB I am not commenting on the companies rights to these patents, or to enforce them. My original comment was in response to mikey601 saying this will be good news for paintball, I dont think it is.