I'm sure people do say that Nick despite the fact that you are slightly sexing up what you heardOriginally posted by Nicky T-Nexus
"I set my heart on shooting an eblade this year"
an oh-so often heard saying in Planet, especially from a certain southern visitor recently
. Although nowhere have i said on this thread or elsewhere that there are any differences or similarities at all between Ebaldes and Race frames in terms of increaseed performance or superiority.J-Doe, my visit to planet was fun, the air hockey was tiring but time consuming, took up most of my visit
I didnt get to see anything elseJack, ignore Kyle, he's young and impulsive, tends to open his mouth before he thinks, which we are still trying to decide if he does. But i believe that Race are a smaller company, with less marketing then Planet, and so the fact that there are more Eblades in the NPPL is not particularly revealing. There are no Eblades in the NXL, neither do any top teams in the USA other than the Bushwackers shoot them, does that mean anything, no. The majority of the top teams will shoot anything, as long as the sponsorship deal is what they satisfactory to them. I am sure that everyone knows this, especially every other gun manufacturer out there, how do Kingman keep BC on Spyders? A kick ass sponsorship deal i would hazard a guess at. The prevailing marker in the USA is the Intimidator, would you take from this that because of their popularity over the Eblade that they are better guns? No, i wouldnt either. Marker distribution is a matter of circumstance rather than anything else.
Walker- you have no proof, neither is there any that Eblades are better, or races are better,its swings and roundabouts, its down to personal preference. So rather than bleating about how Eblades are better, why not just voice it as an opinion? Rather than try to blag proof?
