The Wednesday Poll: Who do you love to hate?

[Robbo]

Originally posted by Booya39
well that wasn't a well thought out response...

Because if roland did have a good point and you should be on the list you then should have had a lengthy post only proving why you should be on the list. Basically, one of your normal, rage filled posts. Your current response would be for someone who doesn't deserve to be on the list which means he didn't have a good point.

But maybe you'll prove me wrong and show everyone that I was the spark to your jug of fuel and afterall roland did have a point.

Booya, I fail to see why my response would or should preclude me from being on the list.
One doesn't gain entry to such a list just by writing lengthy, rage filled posts, I think membership is entitled due to a more comprehensive range of virtues

Boo, you need to read some more on 'Philosophical Arguments And Their Use' before you can introduce the notion I might be contradictory

 

[Booya39]

Originally posted by Robbo
I think membership is entitled due to a more comprehensive range of virtues

Would any of these virtues happen to contain a clause about confusing the paintball field for a wrestling ring?

I've never met you so I can't really say whether you deserve to be on the list or not. This has been more of a devil's advocate approach.

I'm not a huge philospher so I'm not to trying to use philosophy... simply logic. Kind of like if A = B & B = C then A = C.

 

[Robbo]

Originally posted by Booya39
Would any of these virtues happen to contain a clause about confusing the paintball field for a wrestling ring?

I'm not a huge philospher so I'm not to trying to use philosophy... simply logic. Kind of like if A = B & B = C then A = C.

Oh come, come now, I had to defend myself against an unjustified attack of 5 onto one, they chose to confuse the arena, not me

As for your logic:- a ford is a car, a car is an automobile but not all automobiles are fords...the logic is flawed my friend

All philosophers use logic, it's their bread and butter tool for unlocking the world in which we live, it's a pity we couldn't let a few logicians loose on the problems we now have with XBall

 

[Booya39]

If you want to get technical, Ford is a vehicle. They make more than cars

as in your example A = ford, B = car, C = automobile

If you follow my logic and put the words in their correct places you'll find that Ford is an automobile.... HOORAY, we did it!

as for philosophy. Thank you for the lesson in that. I will try to spread the word.

As for Xball, unless you have a perfect philosophy for money (and possible carrying over to greed) and grudges you might not be able to solve this one.

 

[Robbo]

Originally posted by Booya39
If you want to get technical, Ford is a vehicle. They make more than cars

as in your example A = ford, B = car, C = automobile

If you follow my logic and put the words in their correct places you'll find that Ford is an automobile.... HOORAY, we did it!

as for philosophy. Thank you for the lesson in that. I will try to spread the word.

As for Xball, unless you have a perfect philosophy for money (and possible carrying over to greed) and grudges you might not be able to solve this one.

Boo this is my last post on this matter otherwise the heavy hand of some Mod might come crashing in (and rightly so) but you need to re-read my post and be aware of this :-

If A = C, then that must mean C = A, now....not all automobiles are Fords, this should give you the information you require to FULLY understand what I was saying

 

[jokersmoker]

And there was me at work trying to kill time by reading the "hate poll", and all of a sudden i'm in philophosy corner! I'm off to find a philosophy web site to see if theres any paintball on it.....

 

[Gyroscope]

Jeremy Salm is our own private Lee Harvey Oswald. Some believe the lone shooter theory, some don't, and the shooter ain't tellin'.