No sh!t sherlockOriginally posted by Beaker
Agreed on the clarity thing
I can read that sentence about 4 or 5 different ways and could use each to justify a certain decision (like Nick's calling players out for bounces).
I actually agree with you, but included the breaking paint bit as Nick was using this rule as the criteria for elimination - which obviously must include the paint breaking.
And if you are being really picky it says "A judge will determine whether a player felt a hit by where that paintball impacted his body" so in theory a player can get shot in his battle pack 20 times but if he doesn't flinch it's not obvious as it's neither easily observable nor on his body.
You do have a BIG task on your hands .............
But we are still sure if it us who will be responsible for the re-write (I actually hope we are), I just know we have too clean up the Bitburg crap ASAP.
L8tr
goose