Go for the cocker there known for there range and accuracy but there also the most upgradeable gun I thinkbut if you put a hinge on them there even faster just don't screw any thing up.
the age old question: Impulse or Cocker
- Thread starter jwstriker
- Start date
Moi??? sarcy???Originally posted by Walker (PsychoPimps)
Im waiting for Collier or Doo-Doo to reply with some sarcy comment.
Never
Paul.
Weight Issue.....
Quote:
Milhouse......
"Cockers are heavier than impulses, my FF weighs F all..... alot lighter than my evolution."
You aint seen the seriously carved cocker i shoot!
However i have found that a standard Eclipse cocker is lighter (and more compact) than my imp. Again however if you carve the impulse down then you lose weight
Quote:
Milhouse......
"Cockers are heavier than impulses, my FF weighs F all..... alot lighter than my evolution."
You aint seen the seriously carved cocker i shoot!
However i have found that a standard Eclipse cocker is lighter (and more compact) than my imp. Again however if you carve the impulse down then you lose weight
argue, argue . . . that what every bugger seem do on here!
well let look at it this way the air in to the solenoid is destined for the ram . . . how else does the bolt move. . . if the solenoid gets starved of air then the bolt ain't moving anywhere quick. . .so hence the VFF mod to separate air specifically for the solenoid. . .to stop drop off (i guess). . . .the LPR well it does what it says on the tin, lowers (controls) the pressure of air to the solenoid. . .so you can raise the valve pressure which will provide higher air flow. . .and as Walker boy say allows the dwell to be lowered.
Now to me purely from a design point of view (I ain't an impy owner!) using both the VFF and LPR together would be benefical. . . because firstly the LPR will give controlable pressure to the solenoid and the VFF will provide a storage of air to make sure it doesn't get starved!
But if the impy had a decently design high flow valve and separate air chamber for the LPR none of this would be required!!
oh yeah walker it's the hammer that hits the valve . . . not the ram
But on the original topic. . . .have a go of both a see what you like!!
So everyone chill and be good kiddies and play nicely!
well let look at it this way the air in to the solenoid is destined for the ram . . . how else does the bolt move. . . if the solenoid gets starved of air then the bolt ain't moving anywhere quick. . .so hence the VFF mod to separate air specifically for the solenoid. . .to stop drop off (i guess). . . .the LPR well it does what it says on the tin, lowers (controls) the pressure of air to the solenoid. . .so you can raise the valve pressure which will provide higher air flow. . .and as Walker boy say allows the dwell to be lowered.
Now to me purely from a design point of view (I ain't an impy owner!) using both the VFF and LPR together would be benefical. . . because firstly the LPR will give controlable pressure to the solenoid and the VFF will provide a storage of air to make sure it doesn't get starved!
But if the impy had a decently design high flow valve and separate air chamber for the LPR none of this would be required!!
oh yeah walker it's the hammer that hits the valve . . . not the ram
But on the original topic. . . .have a go of both a see what you like!!
So everyone chill and be good kiddies and play nicely!
In my opinion nothing can touch the sandridges rate of fire, and the rest is what everyone else has been saying about cockers they have the best accuracy and everything else.
Adam
Adam
As someone said before the age old questions used to be
Cocker v Mag
Before that it was
Sterling v Sniper
Before that
Phantom v Bushmaster
Before that
Splatmaster v PGP
before that
Sling v Bow
have I missed any?
Cocker v Mag
Before that it was
Sterling v Sniper
Before that
Phantom v Bushmaster
Before that
Splatmaster v PGP
before that
Sling v Bow
have I missed any?