Does it seem to anyone else that the whole concept of sponsorship is a trick? I mean, isn't it direct marketing, in most cases, of something the sponsored player might not have spent hard earned cash on otherwise? Not talkin' about free stuff, here, but the more common discounted-goods-type-sponsor.
If I spent an extra thousand dollars on stuff that is 30% off, that's still a lot of cases of paint I never got to shoot. I should mention that some sponsorships are in fact worthwhile to a player, for example anything that lets that player play more or better 'ball. If United were willing to knock 20% off tickets for my team, I am sure that we would be proud to advertise for them. But if I get 20% off a barrel kit that costs $250 retail... well, why? I have a barrel kit. If someone asks my opinion of it, I tell them why I chose it.
I wonder if sponsorship is as popular (with teams) as it is due to the prestige factor. Maybe it is easier to recruit and keep players in a uniform with little logos all over it. I just wonder if those logos are not a practical impediment in some cases.
Free or reduced cost paint, I understand. Travel expenses, definitely. Even free apparrel makes sense for the players, but working any little arrangement so that one more advertisement goes on the banner seems like foolish status display in most cases.
That said, foolishness is not necessarily the same as meaningless.
If I spent an extra thousand dollars on stuff that is 30% off, that's still a lot of cases of paint I never got to shoot. I should mention that some sponsorships are in fact worthwhile to a player, for example anything that lets that player play more or better 'ball. If United were willing to knock 20% off tickets for my team, I am sure that we would be proud to advertise for them. But if I get 20% off a barrel kit that costs $250 retail... well, why? I have a barrel kit. If someone asks my opinion of it, I tell them why I chose it.
I wonder if sponsorship is as popular (with teams) as it is due to the prestige factor. Maybe it is easier to recruit and keep players in a uniform with little logos all over it. I just wonder if those logos are not a practical impediment in some cases.
Free or reduced cost paint, I understand. Travel expenses, definitely. Even free apparrel makes sense for the players, but working any little arrangement so that one more advertisement goes on the banner seems like foolish status display in most cases.
That said, foolishness is not necessarily the same as meaningless.