Spec Ops Paint
- Thread starter lil wenlock
- Start date
Keep Spec Ops for the woods 
The last thing you want is a peeved off player looking for you after the match because you shot him from 3 feet away with it
The last thing you want is a peeved off player looking for you after the match because you shot him from 3 feet away with it
im not trying to turn all this into a big lecture guys. Just wanted too state that Spec Ops shouldnt be aloud.
everyone knows sepc ops is stupid, and only people in alaska should even think of using it.
but maybe there needs to be rules in place to make sure.
but maybe there needs to be rules in place to make sure.
can i also point out the fact that when people read that post, they should only read about the lense, and not the extra conjecture about the hopper being punched through... since this was a bit of a dodgy event, which was covered to death in another thread!
O
ollytheosteo
Guest
Don't forget that there are a few black shelled paints out there that aren't Spec Ops. I wouldn't use one myself if only as I can't handle my whine but they are out there so watch with the jumping to conclusions.
Personally I'd like to see an end to Spec Ops 'harder than the others' paint in all areas of play. If you feel you need to shoot a harder ball to 'cut through undergrowth' then learn to shoot around it, but it's hardly fair on your opponents to put them through the pain and potential danger of harder paint just to gain some imagined advantage or macho points. We have safety standards for a reason, and choosing to change performance parameters on something as vital as paint should only be done with care
Is it just me or does this look like another one of those 'look at me' threads that discusses a problem that isn't really a problem and is based on ill-informed rumour
Personally I'd like to see an end to Spec Ops 'harder than the others' paint in all areas of play. If you feel you need to shoot a harder ball to 'cut through undergrowth' then learn to shoot around it, but it's hardly fair on your opponents to put them through the pain and potential danger of harder paint just to gain some imagined advantage or macho points. We have safety standards for a reason, and choosing to change performance parameters on something as vital as paint should only be done with care
Is it just me or does this look like another one of those 'look at me' threads that discusses a problem that isn't really a problem and is based on ill-informed rumour