For those PM'ing me.
There are 12 people to start with, split ( in theory) between the top and bottom (ignore the fact a bit that goes over the top, it's just a distraction.
When the animation splits the 12 each split in half (at various points). When they are reassembled there appears to be 13. However you are not seeing 13 people but actually 11 “full” people and 2 “half” people. But, because the 2 half people (the guy on the far left has the very top of his head missing) and the guy at the top of the second row – 6th in from the left (missing the very bottom of his shoes) both look complete, you assume there are 13.
The fact that every else lines up is just clever drawing.
There are 12 people to start with, split ( in theory) between the top and bottom (ignore the fact a bit that goes over the top, it's just a distraction.
When the animation splits the 12 each split in half (at various points). When they are reassembled there appears to be 13. However you are not seeing 13 people but actually 11 “full” people and 2 “half” people. But, because the 2 half people (the guy on the far left has the very top of his head missing) and the guy at the top of the second row – 6th in from the left (missing the very bottom of his shoes) both look complete, you assume there are 13.
The fact that every else lines up is just clever drawing.