It would appear that the point has been lost in translation. The argument is.. that hooligans are in some way similar to paintballer’s, based on an outdated belief, that paintballer’s are weekend Rambo’s one presumes.
However, the sociological perspective on this slant would be that the hooligan, primarily from a matriarchal family structure as Freud identified in his works of 1937, has been scared by the permanent exposure to a female dominated environment, where as the paintballer, primarily coming from a patriarchal family structure, has successfully scaled the evolutionary ladder to become a well adjusted and well balanced individual – not craving the solace and comfort of the mother figure that the hooligan has lost due to the inevitability of premature voice breaking, premature puberty, and premature ejaculation.
Ergo, the comparison between the hooligan and the seasoned paintballer is flawed, based on the fact that sociologically speaking, the painballer is more advanced in terms of the socio-economic hierarchical pyramid…
But WTF do I know!!
I've only got one CSE in car mechanics