Prisoners of War, War Criminals or Terrorist???

[TheRo0sTer]

Ok Buddha my friend I have come up with a new Topic worthy of your Opinion....

Watching the news today and few times over the week-end I hear these bleading heart tree huggers saying the US is mistreating the Taliban and Elqueada prisoners. Now here is my point... F*&^ THEM!!!! They are lucky they weren't turned over to the Northern Aliance... And you know them *******s would have shot everyone of the prisoners. As for the one US person they have back in the US you can figure him as good as dead! He will be tried for Treason! Which can bring the death sentence carried out immediately! I think it is about time the US treats scum bags like scum bags! You know the death sentence and all that kewl ****! An EYE for a Freakin EYE! Can you tell I support the death sentence? Let us hear what you have to say on the matter!

Peace and Fry them F***ers!

 

[FAMINE]

Not a big fan of death sentence bro, must admit i am not too keen on the whole thing thats going on at the moment.

Yes i feel for those that suffered loss on the 11th, but i feel the loss that has been created since is a far worse.

Terrorism has been going for many years, and it is a foolish goverment that thinks it can stop it. It seems the US are reacting in a aggresive way to a defensive situation. Many countries have had terrorist attacks for many years, the way to combat them is increased security and not getting to confident with the "No one would attack us" state of mind.

There will always be people with opposing belief, is retaliation to a foolish action the soloution?

 

[TheRo0sTer]

Originally posted by FAMINE
There will always be people with opposing belief, is retaliation to a foolish action the soloution?

Yes it is!!! You hit me I hit you back! You kill thousands for no reason and well maybe we should have killed that many back! But fortunately for them SAPS in prison, the numbers won't compare! So the Taliban should feel fortunate some got away with thier lives!

 

[MarkehB]

Killing justifies more killing?

 

[TheRo0sTer]

Originally posted by MarkehB
Killing justifies more killing?

YUP!!! Eye For an Eye...

 

[MarkehB]

Your lucky the Japanese dont think like that because then they'd have the right to nuke 2 of your cities. That a quarter of a million civillians your country choose to wipe out.

 

[chris h]

annoyed

The british government says "we r gonna stamp out terrorism, do everything we can 2 combat it".............. so what did they do......they let all the terrorists in ireland out as part of the Good Friday agreement.....ur.....HELLO.....they r nuts.

All that is needed is for the security services 2 b given names and whereabouts of known terrorists.....then slot em. That sends out a pretty good message to terrorism in my opinion!!!!!!

thx 4 allowing me the rant+rave guys

chris

 

[goose]

Dear MarkehB,

You cannot compare the acts committed during declared war between 2 countries and a terrorist act. Also please remember that in the case of the Japanese they could have saved themselves from America's retaliation by staying the hell away from Pearl Harbour.

The only reaction that terrorists understand is hard & swift retaliation. Anything else just helps their cause - "See the USA is not as mighty as you all think, follow me and I will lead you" etc. etc. etc.

People have to stop looking at the terrorist situation from a Western perspective, we as westerners cannot imagine what someone could say that would get us to sit on a truckload of explosives and drive it into a military barracks (USMC barracks in Lebanon in the early 80's). Most westerners would try to find a way to do it and get away alive - look not further than Timothy Mcveigh for a prime example.

Just to end my rant & rave here is something that was sent to me:

With all of this talk of impending war, many of us will encounter "Peace Activists" who will try to convince us that we must refrain from retaliating against the ones who terrorized us all on September 11, 2001.

These activists may be alone or in a gathering. Most of us do not know how to react to them. When you come upon one of these people, or one of their rallies, here are the proper rules of etiquette:

1. Listen politely while this person explains their views. Strike up a conversation if necessary and look very interested in their ideas. They will tell you how revenge is immoral, and that by attacking the people who did this to us; we will only bring on more violence. They will probably use many arguments, ranging from political to religious to humanitarian.

2. In the middle of their remarks, with no warning, punch them in the face.

3. When the person gets up off the ground, they will be very angry and they may try to hit you.

4. Very quickly and calmly remind the person that violence only brings about more violence and remind them of their stand on this matter. Tell them if they are committed to a nonviolent approach to undeserved attacks, they will turn the other cheek and negotiate a solution. Tell them they must lead by example if they really believe what they are saying.

5. Most of them will think for a moment and then agree that you are correct.

6. As soon as they do that, punch them again. Only this time hit them much harder. Throw in a kick to the groin.

7. Repeat steps 2 - 5 until the desired results are obtained and the idiot realizes how stupid an argument he/she is making.

goose

 

[chris h]

spot on

like it goose.....i like it a lot!!!

chris

 

[MarkehB]

What I dont understand is that because these 'terrorists' whatever their purpose dont have a country they control so cannot 'declare war' that this is somehow not a war? They're killing you, your killing them, what more do you need to have a war?

I in no way condone what they did, but if it keeps on like this how many more people will die?