Actually Chris, at UMASS (the only college owned and operated field in the US) you can get a rental, field fee, and 500 rounds of paint for under 30 bucks. We don't reduce the rates to increase customers, and we're in the northeast, and we average around 60 players a sunday now (more once additioal parking is resolved). There are other fields out here in New England with very similar pricing structures who have multiple concept fields, woods fields, forts, etc to cater to all the players.
Again I'm starting to think that the NCPA and eventually the high school equivalent that you're creating is being shoved down our throats as the future of the sport. Currently the player base is growing just fine, we're seeing more, younger players starting to play. New players are getting interested in the sport due to mass merchant exposure, magazines in the major bookstores and magazine sellers in North America (but can we please see more PGI, and less APG on the shelves). Increasingly more old school field owners are realizing that moving to concept fields and out of the woods is destigmatizing the sport. Major markets in the U.S. are seeing more advertising via radio, print, and even TV.
Sticking with the status quo, the sport will continue to increase exponentially over the coming years. My biggest concern is seeing the sport legitimized in the eyes of the public. Given current rates of sales, increased players, field and store openings, etc, it is no doubt that the public will see paintball as a legitimate pastime. My biggest concern is without a quality national circuit, that the sport will only be seen as such, a pastime or hobby.
Which brings us back to increasing the quality of national events, which will in turn make them spectator and media friendly (and more comfortable for the players).
Chris
The other one. Same long posts, different content.