...........That just sucks as far as I am concerned.
The MS talks about improving quality and keeping entry fees at last year's level. Well that's only half true. Fees stay the same but value comes down, because the number of games played for the same fee comes down!!!
They also talk about setting up several more committees, including 1 for the players. Then, why not wait and let the players' committee consult on the 'proposal' to reduce prelim games, rather than announce it now as a done deal.
I, for one, would not vote to reduce the number of 'guaranteed' games to 8. It costs us a small fortune to attend events, and we want value for money.
Come on MS - don't just follow blindly what other tournament series do. Ask your customers what we want and we will gladly tell you.
Dougal
Escarmouche
Ireland
The MS talks about improving quality and keeping entry fees at last year's level. Well that's only half true. Fees stay the same but value comes down, because the number of games played for the same fee comes down!!!
They also talk about setting up several more committees, including 1 for the players. Then, why not wait and let the players' committee consult on the 'proposal' to reduce prelim games, rather than announce it now as a done deal.
I, for one, would not vote to reduce the number of 'guaranteed' games to 8. It costs us a small fortune to attend events, and we want value for money.
Come on MS - don't just follow blindly what other tournament series do. Ask your customers what we want and we will gladly tell you.
Dougal
Escarmouche
Ireland