Not just most players here, but most players worldwide. Tourney players are quick to forget how much of a minority they actually are in worlwide paintball.
I don't dispute the pro ballers athletic abilities. Next question, why should it be tourney paintball in the olympics, when it obviously represents a tiny percentage of paintballers worldwide?
Because it probably is the only true defenition of our sport where two teams are opposed on an EQUAL field of play where, in theory, the better team wins.
The problem with paintball is there is no singular point of focus in play, like ball games or races, one ball, one finishing line. Unless you know what you are looking at with paintball, games can be very similar to the untrained eye. The olympics is a media event, and the sports it shows have to draw viewers or the sponsers go away......
Tournament ball may not be what most players do, but it is the best way of showing what we do to the world without being branded 'army wannabes', and being dismissed at the first hurdle. Everyone that plays for the first time goes to the woods (generally) no matter what format we saw on TV or heard about in another way.
So in short, it is difficult to televise and we will always suffer from the 'military' aspect of the sport, though none exists in our view as ballers.
Recognition as a sport is possible, but the sport is somewhat driven by the industry behind it, until it starts to attract outside sponsors and televised events in a more consistant fashion, we will not get to this first stage.