There's been a webcast for the last 2 years at least.It has improved each year.I would be wary of embracing the PB Access model as loads of statisticians ,figures and over analysis leads to charging and a reduction of audience.
I agree with the improvement from MS, it has improved significantly!
Personally I like the PB Access model, it removes subjectivity with the intro of stats. I concede they may not be the right stats (thinking Moneyball) but it helps develop into sporting model for the US marker. That should improve the perception, and encourage this to be considered a sport alongside the more established US sports. This should have a trickle down effect for global paintball
I dont mind paying for a full weekend if the service remains available and appropriately costed. Considering how much I spend to follow Spurs this is not costly.
What is interesting is the parallel development of web viewing, two differing operating models..