That is NOT two different formats in one competition. It's a 5 man competition of the same format seperate to a 10 man competition of the same format at the SAME event. It's completely diffferent to the change of format half way through one competition like you are proposing.Originally posted by Wadidiz
You may be right, Manike, but PSP/NPPL have played two different formats for years, with a 5-player and 10-player tournament rolled into one (albeit they play the same format throughout each separate event, although once in the semis it is almost like a separate event because you only play your own class). Two formats at the same tournament was one very attractive feature to me because it offered variety--because 5-player and 10-player are so dissimilar.
And I don't think two different "phases" of a tournament means at all doing both half-heartedly. How do you get that?
The tourney format would be the same for all, just more challenging because of the variety.
No, I must say I don't buy your reasoning. I think it is just thinking within the same square (and I mean no disrespect). It's already hard enough for many teams to make most of the 6 Mill events. I still think this would add to the attractiveness and put X-ball within reach of Euros.
Steve
If you change the format in the same competition who is to say the team that wins the second format and the competition was actually the best? It may be that another team was better at the final format but didn't make it in because they weren't as good at the first format.
It's weak half ass way of trying to show two different formats rather than sticking to one.
You could have both formats at the same event like they do with the 5 and 10 man at NPPL. But to mix them is just crappy to me.
It's like running a 5 man event for the prelims and then running a 10 man event for the finals. That will not give you the best 10 man team as the over all winners, nor will it give you the best 5 man team as the overall winners. It's a mix and to me dilutes both genres. It's a half hearted set of results neither of which would be genuine winners of the event in my mind.
Why would it be more challenging because of variety? Isn't it more challenging to become masters of one set format rather than decent in two (which is what I think would be needed to win the event you describe).