Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

Marshalling - how do we make it better?

camsmith

Just call me Cam...
Jun 12, 2003
174
0
0
Surrey, UK
Visit site
I know there's another thread at the moment about the quality of marshalling at the present, but that should not detract from the great organisation of that specific tournament.

I've been involved in an Olympic sport in the past where people (at National Championship level) were refereeing the competition they were involved in. If you want stories of bad calls... I don't think you guys have it bad at all, but understand the frustration.

My question is are there any courses for marshalls? This may even be run by the "Marshall Supplier" mentioned in this other thread.

(CS
 

QuackingPlums

Go get a wee-mee!
Oct 30, 2002
1,209
0
0
Docklands, London
Visit site
You were crap because someone was on the wrong end of a bad call, and because apparently this never happens in other sports or else there would be an outrage.

The fact that these "other sports" are professional, televised events with massive sponsorship and media deals, where millions of people are watching so refs/judges are PAID A HEALTHY WAGE to ensure bad decisions are not made (anybody see the England match the other night? Don't tell me it NEVER happens...) :rolleyes:

One way to improve marshalling, as well as the general attitude to marshalling would be to require all teams to supply, say, 2-3 players after each game to marshall the game afterwards (different division, so no conflict of interest). That way, everybody gets first-hand experience of what it is really like, everybody get's to learn from the fewer, MORE EXPERIENCED marshalls that can now be afforded because the organiser doesn't need to hire so many, and we all take a bite of humble pie cos we realise just how difficult it can be.

It ain't gonna happen (I sit in wait of the "we pay to play, not pay to work" posts) anytime soon, but sounds a workable solution?
:D
 

camsmith

Just call me Cam...
Jun 12, 2003
174
0
0
Surrey, UK
Visit site
It's worked before

I've seen this style work (although it doesn't cut down on the number of "bad call" calls).

This has the advantages of;
- Even marshalls can play (not sit out one tourny)
- Everybody *HAS* to learn the rules <- this can't be a bad thing

Disadvantages;
- Even the "unsportsmanlike" players have to marshall
- As mentioned we pay to play, not marshall

I still see the need for a semi-professional ultimate marshall on each field, but this would reduce the marshalling bill, and therefore may translate into slightly cheaper tournys. Should there be a "Marshalls-R-Us" for these people?
 

Liz

New Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,381
1
0
Kent, UK
Visit site
It's worked before

Originally posted by camsmith
I've seen this style work (although it doesn't cut down on the number of "bad call" calls).

This has the advantages of;
- Even marshalls can play (not sit out one tourny)
- Everybody *HAS* to learn the rules <- this can't be a bad thing

Disadvantages;
- Even the "unsportsmanlike" players have to marshall
- As mentioned we pay to play, not marshall

I still see the need for a semi-professional ultimate marshall on each field, but this would reduce the marshalling bill, and therefore may translate into slightly cheaper tournys. Should there be a "Marshalls-R-Us" for these people?
Sadly, this only partially works. On the plus side
- The overall bill is reduced
- In THEORY, everyone therefore has to learn the rules
- MOST people develop a feeling of what a cr@p job it can be, and go easier on the refs when they play
- everyone gets to play
- everyone learns how to ref in the long run

However, on the minus side
- most of them don't bother to read the rules even when they do have to ref
- some don't bother to do the job properly if it's mandatory, especially if they aren't getting paid at the end of the day - anyone remember a certain US team at the 'Dam last year?:rolleyes:
- large numbers of very inexperienced refs at the same time, even if the field ultimate is an experienced ref
- higher chance of "tit for tat" decisions being made
- if teams have to be rotated out of the schedule for a period to ref, you have either longer days or less games, or exceptionally short breaks between games


I still feel the best option is to have dedicated refs at events, but the 2 main problems are a) getting them trained and b) actually getting enough that aren't wanting to play instead of ref.

There are very few people who are prepared to run training courses for refs (face it, it's not as much fun as training people to play), and they have to have a wealth of experience both as refs and players, AND be able to teach, AND know all possible rules inside out, AND be prepared to give up valuable playing/family time to do the job. Also, it's not exactly cheap to run a reffing course because as well as the actual trainer you need "actors" for the trainees to practice on, plus you're using facilities that could be used for other paying customers, and you try getting a decent amount of money out of the players who are learning to do the job.

I can't in all honesty blame people for wanting to play rather than marshall an event. It's a long, hard day & and all you get out of it is about enough money to pay your paint bill next time you play, and a load of abuse from the players.
But you have to remember - no refs, no games. We came close to restricting Sunday's M25 event to 3 fields and 32 teams not because of space, cost or hassle but simply because we wouldn't have had enough marshalls for 4 fields staffed properly.
 

potbitch

just sticking my nose in
Mar 10, 2003
39
0
0
la la land
Visit site
would it be possible to run marshall training days along side the events puting traineis shadowed by the experienced marshalls on each field giving a better experience for all

theretical end result could be
more people on each field
long term more trained marshalls
also from an organisers point of view the cost of running a training day would change and could possibly help fund the marshalling or maybe a better class of marshall
 

JoseDominguez

New cut and carved spine!
Oct 25, 2002
3,185
0
0
www.myspace.com
It needs to pay well enough to attract enough marshals with a proffesional attitude...which will cost. So where will the cash come from?
At the moment the only real incentive to marshall well is reputation and furthering the sport........... and the teams that work at it really excell, but what's the incentive for anyone else? they are only human and I'm afraid they got's to get paid.
The sport is advancing and we all need to contribute, but the marshaling issue needs a cash injection to fix it.