A mistake is one thing, to blatantly lie is another thng. And thats exactly what Dan Perez have done. The question is why?
Magued
Still cameras, video cameras, spectators - none of them had exactly the same view as the ref who made the call. From what he saw, he made the best call he could. That's what i do every game. I hope that I'm right more often than I'm wrong, but to hear the crowd and the players I'm wrong about 100% of the time. But that's part of being a ref in any sport - making split second decisions to the best of your ability.
Everyone's had a few days now to study pictures and video. I bet you've studied the pictures and watched the videos a few times before you came to a final conclusion. The referee, with four players blasting away at each other, had less time to make the calls than it's taken you to read this post.
Whether Dan made the right call or not, I'm willing to bet that he made the best call he could in the situation. I know Dan pretty well and I don't think he has a bias for or against either team. To imply that he does just shows what level of respect refs in this sport receive.
Chicago had a good quote from Max about chaos and winning - "Games are won and lost in chaos." if the game descends into chaos, the referees are the ones who end up having to decide who wins and loses. Until the sport progresses to the point that instant replay is an option, we're going to have to live with the referees decisions.
(I cribbed a quote from Chicago. What can I say - I got shot in the head a lot this weekend)