I think the point of the article is that the rules are not defined and that the way of handing out punishment is not defined.That VTDB paragraph was so badly written, I struggled to get much from it. If what I understand is correct, the point of the article was that:
A: The actions that Hugo took aren't covered in the rule book, or any rule book that could be construed as having effect in European paintball; therefore there is no written punishment for such actions and the ban is somewhat placed on questionable grounds.
B: MS are being directly criticised for handing out 'a ban out of thin air', even going so far as stating that everyone should be fearful of their position in the series because of this.
I 100% believe he should be banned but i also believe that there should be a correct way of deciding what that punishment shall be. After all people are asking for events like the MS to be available to the wider public (tv etc). How can we promote a sport where there is no upto date rule book, after all if it wasnt for the fact I started on sites like this I would never have been told about rule changes with coaching, kit colours and bunker changes.
I maybe way off the mark but thats how I read it.
Cheers
Last edited: