Geo 3.1!

[MattyD]

Is it just me, or do the grips kinda look out of proportion with the marker body, they suit the LV1, but they just look a bit bulky to go with the tiny frame of the GEO, plus, it seems like your paying about £500 more than a standard Geo 3 to loose a bit of macroline......

/myopinion

See what your saying with the bulkyness, won't be £500 more though, and yeah there isn't many changes, its an inbetween model that works well for companies.

They know sponsored teams get new guns every year, and are able to afford to because of the original discounts they are given. So they know they can easily sell 1000's of these easily and with little investment in product development.

It's a win win, the gun lovers get a shiny new toy, and the company make an easy bit of money to further invest in product development, and generally do well in business.

At least they don't take the biscuit like Dye, who have produced almost the same gun year on year with very little changes!

/myopinion

 

[Richiemonk]

£500 was a guesstimate, insert any price you feel relevant

I'm an Ego man through and through lol

 

[mid-effect]

Not going to lie. I was gutted when they released this. I really dont like the way the LV1 held. Looking sexy though. Never thought I would be saying this but think I might be switching to dye

 

[TommyT]

I don't like the grip.

 

[Wolfee]

Despite the divided opinions, here is mine to give you a good look.

 

[hoot]

Lovely!

 

[tombut716]

Anyone got a review on this yet, I'm interested in getting one

 

[Richiemonk]

Anyone got a review on this yet, I'm interested in getting one

Yep...shoots like a Geo 3 with fat grips....

Its the same marker dude so u won't see anything different review wise......

 

[M4rkm93]

Much prefer the look of the geo 3 to be honest. Plus it costs less and shoots exactly the same as the 3.1. If it was between a 3 and a 3.1 then it would have to be the 3. No brainer really.

 

[Wolfee]

Much prefer the look of the geo 3 to be honest. Plus it costs less and shoots exactly the same as the 3.1. If it was between a 3 and a 3.1 then it would have to be the 3. No brainer really.

In fairness you are right, its just having the option of a macroless design and a thicker front handle as apposed to the regulator on its own that made it more appealingto me.