jj igotcha said:
i personally think it is a joke that some teams are privvy to the field plans before others, even more of a joke that some teams are involved in designing the fields, dont tell me that they are not gaining an advantage over the other cpl teams. i really enjoyed marseille but the MS are in danger of undoing all the good work done there with this situation. is it any coincidence that the teams with reps on the field committee all performed exceptionally well in the M7.
jj.
This is not actuelly the case, the fields wasnt done until last week and they actuelly send it out on Friday. I didnt recive it, but that was my fault.
And the Marseille fields was out in good time for everybody to practice on. I think we can put the good results in Marseille for the teams that have reps in the field comimittee to good planning and good players.
The other issue is if teams should do the field design. Well if the teams doesnt, then everybody will jump on the Millennium for not using the players experiance etc. And when the fields suck, the millennium board doesnt have to hear us moaning about it to them. Its pretty smart. Im sure that the field committe is happy to take in more people from other teams if someone wish to be part of that process.
The only thing that the committe needs to be careful about is that they release the fields in time. That way nobody can bitch about them having a advantage.
Magued