great idea but in the modern market advertising is king and that sort of testing leads to isolating the people who pay most for the magazine . 60% - 80% of the money made is from the advertisers so a bad review would be like cutting your own throat.Originally posted by Silverjay UK
Yes!
PGI should form an opinion and rank all kit through ojective testing - everyone seems to sit on the fence about what is scientifically the best market around.
This testing could include playing style and design as well as all the usual performance and reliability style.
I'd value such an opinion and it would influence my choice rather than having to pounce on every other player and ask for a go with a marker (or different setup marker) that I've never shot with before. Sure people are flattered to be asked but it would help newer (or me - outdated) players choose.
Originally posted by Bad Dave
}{y8ri|) keep the herbs growing...you need them.
The new extreme looks hot, then there are the C+C versions as well. the e-mag is on the up.