Thanks Rich. An explanation of how the ranking points are calculated would be nice when you get a chance, though 
CPPS section scores and overall round 2 positions.
- Thread starter RICH HARRIS
- Start date
In that case, I'm afraid something has to be amiss with the XBall scores - it shouldn't be possible for Entity to come bottom in the group with 2 wins (6 points.)
And if the sections waere changed to a divisional split, I'm not sure it's valid to simply merge the results to determine ranking points.
And if the sections waere changed to a divisional split, I'm not sure it's valid to simply merge the results to determine ranking points.
Ive had discussions with people over this. Problem is with it being one big league it only works if we do it like round 1, but with teams dropping out last min/not showing up etc it causes issues. Problem is without play offs it makes it hard to get an outright winner for the ranking points. But if you spilit it as we did into top half/bottom half and handicap the points the teams in the B div will complain that they are being restricted and its unfair on them.
From rd 3 onwards all divs for M7 will be snake seeded as Millennium and points assigned accordingly and run like we did at round 1, this means working on multiples of 3 teams in a section.
From rd 3 onwards all divs for M7 will be snake seeded as Millennium and points assigned accordingly and run like we did at round 1, this means working on multiples of 3 teams in a section.
Fair enough -- there's not an easy answer to a situation like this, and no solution will be fair to everyone.
But aside from that, I'm still pretty sure the scores are wrong.
EDIT: and the P/D doesn't add up to 0, so something's definitely wrong.
But aside from that, I'm still pretty sure the scores are wrong.
EDIT: and the P/D doesn't add up to 0, so something's definitely wrong.
The xball scores are worked out onmatch points first, then point difference. Then ranked in order and assigned the Millennium ranking points.
I get that, but I think you've a result missing, because it's not mathematically possible for a team with 2 wins out of 4 to come last (unless every team has 2 wins, in which case it's decided on point difference, and the team with the worst point difference is last.)
And the point differences of the whole division must always add up to 0, otherwise something is wrong. In this case the p/d adds up to +3.
I will double check em as i am going off whats on the score sheets, but i know in Group A disruption won all 4 matches, where as in group B the winner won 3, and runner up won 3. In group A, 2-4th all won 2 games each.
In Entity's case they finishe don 2 match points, score diff of -1, Smokin Aces in group B finished on 2 match points, score dilff of 0 thus ranking them above you.
Its massively flawed but its done now, Ill hold my hands up and admit should of stuck with snake seeded divisions as in hind sight it would of been easier all round.
In Entity's case they finishe don 2 match points, score diff of -1, Smokin Aces in group B finished on 2 match points, score dilff of 0 thus ranking them above you.
Its massively flawed but its done now, Ill hold my hands up and admit should of stuck with snake seeded divisions as in hind sight it would of been easier all round.