Shortened to save space...Slight flaw in this argument, and it's come up a lot. Science is *not* based on facts...
Science is filled with unproven theories, often multiple theories are suggested to explain the same event....
Light those torches
I agree, and to quote the great Dara o'Briain, "Science doesn't have all the answers, and it knows it doesn't have all the answers, otherwise it would stop. But just because science doesn't have all the answers doesn't mean you can fill in the gaps with whatever fairy story most appeals!"
Its a good point, in ages past before true science, people needed some explaination of what they were doing here. But now, (in my mind at least) Science has discovered why we're here and so lets just knock all the other stuff on the head. Anyone who answers the difficult questions with "there's more to life than evidence" obviously has none.
If religion and the fear of going to a nasty place when you die if you're a bad person or a nice place if your nice actually caused people to be nice, then fair enough, but when it causes people to kill other people cos they're going to a different place? I'd have banned religion by now (this is why I'll never get elected to any position of power!)
Scooby