campaign scores?

[Zwitta]

dammit, I knew I should of read my other post before posting that nah, I'm just jostling you guys, I love stirring up a bit of fun on the forums.. well done for making it through.

 

[Collier]

I did hear some rollocks about the place should have come down to alphabetical order of the team name??? Made the point that it happened years ago to Avalanche and as such (A) they went through...
Anyone shed any light?
Paul

 

[Pinchaaay]

so there is method in the madness of the A A's then



Chris

 

[Collier]

Originally posted by ~chrisy~
so there is method in the madness of the A A's then



Chris

lol

Paul

 

[Zwitta]

never read an alphabetical one... just the lovely rule regarding

"In case of a tie score among teams such tie will be broken first by head to head competition during the whole tournament. The winner of such contenst advancing. If the tie among teams remains after such tie breaking determination, the tie shall be broken by the previous round scores; the team with the greatest score in the previous round advancing. If the tie among teams remains after such tie breaking determination, the tie shall be broken by the next previous rounds scores; if the tie among teams remains one more game will be played. The winning team will be advancing. If the tie still remains the tie will be broken by theseeding that the teams had entering the tournament, the highest seeded team advancing. If the tie among teams remains, another game will be played. The winning team advancing".......... phew

what a rule, go check it out.. millenium rule 5.4 (paul need not since he knows it already )

 

[Collier]

Originally posted by Zwitta
never read an alphabetical one... just the lovely rule regarding

"In case of a tie score among teams such tie will be broken first by head to head competition during the whole tournament. The winner of such contenst advancing. If the tie among teams remains after such tie breaking determination, the tie shall be broken by the previous round scores; the team with the greatest score in the previous round advancing. If the tie among teams remains after such tie breaking determination, the tie shall be broken by the next previous rounds scores; if the tie among teams remains one more game will be played. The winning team will be advancing. If the tie still remains the tie will be broken by theseeding that the teams had entering the tournament, the highest seeded team advancing. If the tie among teams remains, another game will be played. The winning team advancing".......... phew

what a rule, go check it out.. millenium rule 5.4 (paul need not since he knows it already )

Sweet, that's what was followed was it not? Sorry I'm not understanding any controversy here?!?

The place was played for and Exodus won where does 'behind the sceane dealing come into it???

Paul

 

[Zwitta]

fine, ok, I'll go into it in a little more detail..

Apparently someone refused to sign a score sheet, it all leads from there...

 

[Zwitta]

More controversy.. where were nexus staging from?? maybe someone can answer this for me... was it from the back of the planet tent?

 

[northern monkey]

Nexus staged from the staging area like everyone else. In fact on friday afternoon they were on the same table that dynasty used in the morning, next to the PGI Sharks and a couple of tables from the Berks. Not much controversy there..............unless you have more enlightening info for us.................

 

[MrPink]

Everyone staged in the main area this year - if you had been caught elsewhere there where penalties