I ain't as friendly as Paul C, but I agree with what he's saying. But to put it in my own words:
If you took a fcuking minute to actually read and/or engage your brain, you'd understand that all that Beaker has put up is the stuff that he's heard, he's even inviting those involved to give their side of the story.
All I see so far is a half assed attempt at the usual "wasn't me, the marshall was a dickwad". I ain't buying it yet, and until I see a bunch of people that know what they're talking about backing up either side of the story, I know what I'll believe. So far all I see is somebody getting bitchslapped with a ban because they couldn't behave. I'd love to see things proven otherwise, nothing like a little controversy to spice up the boards, but as I see things from here, you got what you had coming.
RPPB, Beaker ain't making accusations, he's only passing in the info he got, it's you that's making the wild accusations towards him now. So please remove your head from ass before you post again, although it may be lodged in too firm to budge.