Bps Debate

[Duggzer0]

ive only hit 17 twice, but personally i dont see the point in it, my m8 just doesnt think its humanly possible, nah i dont play at the PA sorry dude, i wud much rather fire a slower rof cos that way u aint wasting paint, cheers for helpin me settle this guys.

 

[jotajotaZ]

Originally posted by Nickyboy
I'm not saying it didn't happen but without bounce or anything he would have had to flick that trigger once every 5.88 millieseconds.

58.8 miliseconds get your math right

 

[John C]

Originally posted by Duggzer0
ive only hit 17 twice

How do you know that ?

 

[Nickyboy]

Originally posted by jotajotaZ
58.8 miliseconds get your math right

Yeah I'll give you that one, I was close.

 

[JoseDominguez]

Originally posted by Duggzer0
ive only hit 17 twice, but personally i dont see the point in it, my m8 just doesnt think its humanly possible, nah i dont play at the PA sorry dude, i wud much rather fire a slower rof cos that way u aint wasting paint, cheers for helpin me settle this guys.

With a JT excellerator?
You haven't 'cos it can't, and your quantum can't get near that.
Waggling your fingers really fast is one thing, actually getting each to count as a trigger pull is a different thing altogether

 

[Bolter]

Originally posted by JoseDominguez
With a JT excellerator?
You haven't 'cos it can't, and your quantum can't get near that.
Waggling your fingers really fast is one thing, actually getting each to count as a trigger pull is a different thing altogether

exactly. Although with practice (and I dont mean once in a while) you can shoot at your maximum speed accurately, and put a great deal of pressure on certain game situations. It is a good tool to have but takes a great deal of effort before you can use it to effect.

At the end of the day it is not as important as say, teamwork and field craft, a high bps should be one of the last things on your "to learn" list.