Some 'interesting' bits and bobs here:
Section 1: Airforce stand-down
1:1 It has become popular mythology in the media that fighter jets were
scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as the
following research shows. Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers, by
Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, 14 Nov 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm
1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm
1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely, Research & documentation by
Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, Jan 2002
http://emperor.vwh.net/indict/urgent.htm
1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11,they just " arrived late "
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/faq.htm
1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely, 12 Dec 2001
http://www.nypress.com/14/50/taki/bunker.cfm
1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements
http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/ang-mission.htm
1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm
Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray aircraft is a routine
procedure. It happened 67 times in the 10 months between September 2000
and June 2001.
1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11. Associated Press Aug 13 2002.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/2002/ap081302.html
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another 9/11 Aug 14 2002
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/attack/main518632.shtml
1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/1,13319,FL_jet_081502,00.html
1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual air traffic events. Fox
news Aug 12 2002
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60245,00.html#top
So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets scrambled, and why has a
cover up story been concocted?
In the unlikely event that the airforce failed through incompetence, ( not
once but 4 times! ) where is the major inquiry?
I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes at race tracks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 2: Complicit behaviour of G.W.Bush
It has become common mythology in the media that George W. Bush was at
Booker Elementary School when he learned of the first WTC crash. This is a
lie. Why is Bush lying about where he was, and what he knew?
2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open by Illarion Bykov and Jared
Israel.
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-3.htm
This is not the only lie Bush has told about his movements that morning. See
how many times he has changed his story.
2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/01/113757.php
(Read the section called "A tangle of lies")
2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1. A strange press conference.
By jared israel and francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002.
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif1.htm
2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2:
White House Cover-up Creates More Problems than it Solves
by Jared Israel and Francisco Gil-White [7 October 2002]
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif2.htm
2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush's Claim that he Saw TV Footage
of 1st Plane Hitting WTC
Comments by Jared Israel [Posted 12 September 2002]
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/liar.htm
Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair. Bush is lying about where
he was, what he was doing and what he knew, during the crucial period
between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
----------------
Why did the President - after being told "America is under attack" continue
to listen to schoolchildren reading for another 25 minutes ? Why was he
cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known that at least one more
hijacked plane was on the loose ? View the TV footage which proves treason
at the top level.
2:6
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 3: The Fictitious Hijackers
If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there no Arabic names on any of the
passenger lists? If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the " innocents "
on the lists are alleged to be the hijackers?
3:1
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html
Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)
3:2
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html
AA 77 (Pentagon crash)
3:3
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html
UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)
3:4
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html
UAL 93 (Pennsylvania crash)
If they are alleged to have been using non- Arabic aliases (19 obviously
Arabic men got on board using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ? ), why
did the FBI claim that they were traced through the use of credit cards to
buy tickets in their own names?
If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before boarding, as claimed in
this article
3:5
http://www.policetalk.com/9_hijackers.html
why is there no airport security footage of them? How did they (allegedly)
get on board with knives, guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while being
searched, but avoiding security cameras and not being on the passenger
lists? What aliases were they alleged to be using when they were searched,
and if they were not using aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?
What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers are still alive, and had
nothing to do with the attacks?
3:6
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
3:7
http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm
3:8
http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world01/afgwar-die.htm
3:9
http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_12_01/STILL_ALIVE__FBI_Mixed_Up_on_T/still_alive__fbi_mixed_up_on_t.html
3:10
http://www.mujahideen.fsnet.co.uk/wtc/wtc-hijackers.htm
According to this article
3:11
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20021210/ts_nm/attack_germany_trial_dc_2
the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to subdue the passengers and
crew. If they used gas they would have been affected themselves - unless
they had masks. The story gets better all the time. They somehow got on
board with masks, gas, guns,knives and electronic guidance systems, in spite
of being searched, didn't show up on the airport security cameras, and were
not on the passenger lists. They left flight manuals in Arabic in rented
cars outside the airport ( last minute brushing up on the way there, about
how to fly the things! ) and then crashed the planes in breath taking
displays of skilled piloting. Just to make sure we knew who they were, their
passports were conveniently found in spite of fiery crashes which
incinerated the planes and occupants. So they got on board with false IDs
but used their real passports ?
If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the planes and airport
security systems failed due to incompetence ( not once but 19 times! ),
where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into racehorse
doping scandals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 4: More oddities
Why the official story concerning the hijacking of AA11 (first WTC crash)
cannot possibly be true.
4:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observer1s Cut) American Airlines Flight 11,
Re-examined By David L. Graham
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/redux.html
Was an urban rescue team sent to New York the night before the attacks?
4:2
http://www.halturnershow.com/FEMA.htm
4:3
http://www.tpromo.com/gk/jun02/062602.htm
4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects official story of 9 11
attacks. Interview with Andreas von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html
National Security Advisor Rice and White House spokesman Fleischer lied in
saying that nobody had ever conceived of planes being used in this manner,
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC
News May 16 2002
4:5
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
when the 1994 extract from Time magazine, quoted in article 2:1 demonstrates
that the potential problem had been recognized for decades. And there are
other examples of this possibility having been widely recognized prior to
Sept 11.
4:6 "Omens of terror." by David Wise Oct 7 2001
http://www.hermes-press.com/omens.htm
In article 4:5 Rice also lied in saying that any threat had been
overwhelmingly perceived as being overseas. The statement she made is in
this press briefing.
4:7 Press Briefing by National Security Advisor Dr. Condoleezza Rice. The
James S. Brady Briefing Room May 16 2002 . 4.10PM EDT
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/05/20020516-13.html
But this is the truth about the memo to which she refers.
4:8 August memo focused on attacks in the U.S. by Bob Woodward and Dan
Eggen. Washington Post staff writers. May 18 2002. page A01.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A3
5744-2002May17¬Found=true
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?
Why is it that the US government doesn't feel confident enough of it's case
against Bin laden to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding" convenient
video " confession" tapes ? Probably because new video technology makes it
impossible to distinguish between a real video confession and a fake.
When seeing and hearing isn't believing. by William M. Arkin. Washington
Post Feb 1 1999
5:1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm
Last word in High Tech trickery. By David Higgins Sydney Morning Herald.
may 16 2002
5:2
http://smh.com.au/articles/2002/05/16/1021415016681.html
For more detailed evidence of a preplanned agenda to fabricate evidence
against Bin Laden,
Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.
2:2
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/01/113757.php
(Read the section called "Evidence please !")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level foreknowledge
In the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported that investigators
were already looking into huge volumes of insider trading on airline stocks
in the weeks leading up to the attacks. Why has this story since completely
disappeared? Do authorities seriously expect us to believe that more than a
year later, they still do not know who was responsible? Should not alarm
bells have been ringing BEFORE the attacks with these record volumes of
trading? If the executive director of the CIA had previously managed the
firm which handled much of the trade, are we seriously expected to believe
that he doesn't know who was responsible?
Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly Into The CIA's
Highest Ranks -- CIA Executive Director `Buzzy' Krongard Managed Firm That
Handled `Put' Options on UAL, by Michael C. Ruppert, 9 Oct 2001
6:1
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_krongard.html
Mystery of terror `insider dealers', by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001
6:2
http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=99402
Profits of Death -- Insider Trading and 9-11, by Tom Flocco - Edited by
Michael C. Ruppert, 6 Dec 2001
6:3
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FLO112B.html
Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into local
government contract scandals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 7: The pentagon frame up
It is alleged that American Airlines 77 ( a hijacked Boeing 757 ) crashed
into the Pentagon. A Boeing 757 is a very large aircraft with a wingspan of
125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it make an initial hole 12 ft
wide, collapsing only about a 35 ft depth of the outer ring of the
building - and not leave any wreckage outside ?
This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall
7:1
http://66.129.143.7/june2aa.htm
proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon was NOT AA 77, which
demonstrates the Pentagon attack to have been a self - inflicted frame up.
For a quick overview of the impossibility of the official story
7:2
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
For a full physical analysis of the crash scene
Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash. by Gerard Holmgren Oct
2002
7:3
http://alberta.indymedia.org/news/2002/10/4578.php
Why was there a concerted effort to fabricate eyewitness evidence for the
official story regarding AA 77?
Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined. by Gerard Holmgren
June 2002
7:4
http://hamilton.indymedia.org:8081/front.php3?article_id=1786&group=webcast
7:5 The Pentagon crash hoax
http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/WhatHitThePentagon/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 8: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a retaliation for Sept 11, why
had it already been planned months before ?
BBC News report by George Arney.
8:1
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1550000/1550366.stm
U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida. White house given strategy two days
before Sept 11.NBC news. May 16 2002
8:2
http://www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/msnbc051602.html
US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of September 11 By David Rennie in
Washington
8:3
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/08/05/walq05.xml
Why were we originally told that the attack on Afghanistan was not planned
prior to Sept 11, and was purely a retaliation to a " surprise " attack, and
the story then changed after proof of the preplanned attack came to light ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 9: U.S. and Bin Laden co-operate behind the scenes.
The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin Laden so much that they
wanted to get him first. So why didn't they arrest him when they had the
chance in July 2001?
The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment at an American Hospital
last July in Dubai, by Alexandra Richard, Translated courtesy of Tiphaine
Dickson, Le Figaro, 11 Oct 2001
9:1
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html
9:2
http://guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html
9:3
http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/lefigaro.htm
Bin Laden met with the CIA in July and walked away by Michael C. Ruppert
9:4
http://www.rense.com/general16/bin.htm
And why was the Bush family still in business with the Bin Laden Family,
even AFTER Sept 11?
Osama bin Laden's Bush family Business Connections, Alliance With Pakistan
Will Stimulate Drug Trade, Bring Revenues Under U.S. Control --Colombian
Opium Production Will Soar; The Taliban's Biggest Economic Attack on the
U.S. Came in February With The Destruction of Its Opium Crop by Michael C.
Ruppert, 18 Sept 2001
9:5
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/09_18_01_bushbin.html
Carlyle profit from Afghan war, by David Lazarus, 2 Dec 2001
9:6
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LAZ112A.html
Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top Equity Firm, by Leslie Wayne,
5 Mar 2001
9:7
http://www.truthout.com/0662.Bush.Saudi.htm
The George W. Bush Money Tree
9:8
http://www.bushnews.com/bushmoney.htm
Bush Family's dirty little secret: President's oil companies funded by Bin
Laden family and wealthy Saudis who financed Osama bin Laden, by Rick Wiles,
Sep 2001
9:9
http://www.americanfreedomnews.com/afn_articles/bushsecrets.htm
Arms Build-up Enriches Carlyle Group, Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark
Fineman, 10 Jan 2002
9:10
http://www.truthout.com/01.11F.Arms.Carlyle.htm
Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden Story by Jared Israel
9:11
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probestop-i.htm
BushLaden by Jared Israel
9:12
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen.htm
Addition to the above article
9:13
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen2-i.htm
Judicial Watch: Bush/Bin Laden connection " has now turned into a scandal "
Statement from Judicial watch with comments by Jared Israel
9:14
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/jw.htm
9:15 Bin laden. Terrorist monster: Take two ! by Jared Israel. Oct 9 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/taketwo-a.htm
9:16 New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had business ties with Osama's Brother
in Law by Michel Chossudovsky 27 December 2002
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO212A.html
And why did the US turn down an offer to extradite Bin Laden in 1996, AFTER
naming him as wanted for the 1993 WTC bombing?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 10: The suspicious collapse of the World trade centre Towers.
How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious inquiry? Why was the debris rushed
away for recycling before any examination could be held?
10:1 Muslims suspend laws of physics by J. McMichael Nov 25 2001
http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/physics_1.html
10:2 Muslims suspend laws of Physics. part 2 by J.McMichael
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/mslp_ii.htm
"Burning Questions...Need Answers": Fire Engineering's Bill Manning Calls
for Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse, 4 Jan 2002
10:3
http://zgrams.zundelsite.org/pipermail/zgrams/2002-January/000200.html
10:4
http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/jan2002/markr19-12.htm
10:5
http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/PDF/FireEngineering-1-4-02-BurningQuestionsNeedAnswers.pdf
10:6 A firefighter says "we think there were bombs set in the building"
http://people.aol.com/people/special/0,11859,174592-3,00.html
10:7 In Curious Battle: An expert recants on Why the WTC collapsed by John
Flaherty and Jared Israel
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/albu.htm
10:8 Documentary footage from the scene of the WTC attacks, and eyewitness
accounts from firefighters at the scene reveal serious flaws in the official
accounts.
http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings/911-oddities-revealed.htm
For a series of engineering articles and informative videos on the WTC
collapse, see
10:9
http://home.attbi.com/~jmking/Collapse_update.htm
10:10 Evidence of explosives in South WTC Tower collapse
http://la.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/23816.php
10:11 The World Trade Centre demolition
http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/wtc-demolition.htm
10:12 Chapter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report (with comment)
http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch1.htm
10:13 Chapter 2 (with comment)
http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch2.htm
Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosene) burns at 800 degrees. Are
we seriously expected to believe that burning kerosene towards the top of
the building ( heat travels upwards ) somehow caused both towers to neatly
implode in a manner identical to that of a controlled demolition ?
Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into suburban housefires.
Why is discussion of the possibility of a controlled implosion completely
taboo? Why do authorities keep inventing ridiculous stories about burning
jet fuel melting steel?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 11: Hands off Bin laden !
Why were the FBI told to not investigate the Bin Laden family links in the
US?
Has someone been sitting on the FBI? Transcript of a BBC Newsnight Report on
"the questionable links of the bin Laden Family," 6 Nov 2001
11:1
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BBC111A.html
11:2
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probetrans.htm (added comments by
Jared Israel)
Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin Ladens, Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001
11:3
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/HIN111A.html
US efforts to make peace summed up by `oil', by Lara Marlowe, 19 Nov 2001
11:4
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAR111A.html
11:5
http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/news369.htm
Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror Links Say They Were Told,
‘Let Sleeping Dogs Lie’. By Brian Ross and Vic Walker. ABC News Dec 19 2002
11:6
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html
After capturing one of the six most wanted Taliban leaders, the US then let
him go. "By mistake " of course, because of "flawed intelligence."
11:7 Taliban general 'freed by mistake' Sunday Times Dec 19 2002
http://www.sundaytimes.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,7034,5704967^15574,00.html
11:8 US accidentally set wanted Taliban Leader free. Clari news Dec 18 2002.
http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/bn/Qus-attacks-taliban.RVGa_CDI.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 12: Its really not so surprising.
In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a CIA plan to commit terrorist
acts against the US and frame Cuba.
Friendly Fire -- Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities
to Provoke War With Cuba, by David Ruppe, 1 May 2001
12:1
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962, The National Security
Archive, 30 Apr 2001
12:2
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
Northwoods - a plan for terror to justify war. Comments by Jared Israel.
12:3
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-int.htm
Scanned images of the actual document.
12.4 Page i
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i.htm
12.5 Page ii
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-ii.htm
12:6 Page iii
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-iii.htm
12.7 Page 1
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-1.htm
12.8 Page 2
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-2.htm
12.9 Page 3
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-3.htm
12.10 Page 4
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-4.htm
12.11 Page 5
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-5.htm
12.12 Page 6
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-6.htm
12.13 Page 7
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-7.htm
12.14 Page 8
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-8.htm
12.15 Page 9
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-9.htm
12:16 Page 10
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-10.htm
12.17 Page 11
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-11.htm
12.18 Page 12
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-12.htm
US military schemes- ominously like 9/11.
12:19
http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/bamford.htm
If such tactics were considered normal and acceptable practice by the
Government in 1962, what evidence is there that things have changed?
Henry Kissinger advocated a similar strategy in 1992
12:20
http://www.spotlight.org/Newsbureau/Prisoner/Media/media.html
as Did Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997.
A War in the Planning for Four Years. HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ARE?
Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CFR Put War Plans In a 1997 Book - It Is "A
Blueprint for World Dictatorship," Says a Former German Defense and NATO
Official Who Warned of Global Domination in 1984,in an Exclusive Interview
With FTW by Michael C. Ruppert
12:21
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 13: Who created and funded the Al Qaeda Network?
A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror -- The United States and
Islam, by Carol Brouillet ·
13:1
http://www.communitycurrency.org/vital.html
Bin Laden in the Balkans - Collection of mainstream media articles. Compiled
by Jared Israel
13:2
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/binl.htm
The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam
13:3
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/creat.htm
"Articles documenting US creation of Taliban and Bin Laden's terrorist
network" Series of links to different articles
13:4
http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/doc.htm
"Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA" by Jared Israel
13:5
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/madein.htm
"Bush and the media cover up the Jihad schoolbook scandal" by Jared Israel
13:6
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm
U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo, by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov 2001
13:7
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/PAS111A.html
Which Terrorists are worse? Al Quaeda? Or the KLA? by Jared Israel
13:8
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/kla-aq.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 14 : Who created the civil war in Afghanistan?
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National
Security Adviser [Posted 6 October 2001]. Ex- National Security Chief
Brzezinski admits: Afghan war and Islamism were made in Washington
14:1
http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/brz.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 15:Why have the President and Vice President resisted moves for an
inquiry into Sept 11?
Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes CNN Jan 29 2002.
15:1
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe
Bush, GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry. CNN May 17 2002
15:2
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/16/president.gop.senators
Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept. 11 Inquiry Reuters newswire UK May 26
2002
15:3
http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=1680
Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002, 2:22pm
15:4
http://www.mikehersh.com/article_158.shtml
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC
News May 16 2002
4:5
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
15.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query panel. CBS News. May 23 2002.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml
