Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

best 5 teams in the uk

spurs01

New Member
Oct 6, 2003
11
0
0
bristol
Originally posted by The New Paddy
Originally posted by spurs01
I think its because they have not won anything, and also bare in mind alot of people never see them play apart from at Toulouse and/or Campaign

[Originally posted by weedave [/i]
They played 4 Millennium series events this year.
Lisbon, DMA, Toulouse and Campaign.

QUOTE]Out of all the UK teams, they ranked 3rd on the millennium series for 2003 in Am B.


lol Put that in your Pipe n smoke


Your team has been around for quite a while yeah?? How come they played a whole season as AM B???? I mean look at method played 1 event as novice, then only played 2 more and entered the last one as AM. Or zone played one event as novice and have moved up straight away. Joz Kidz, now AM A.

In my opinion they cant be placed in the top 5 as they play AM B and have not won any events they have entered in the series.
 

The New Paddy

Irish $tyle
Originally posted by spurs01
Your team has been around for quite a while yeah?? How come they played a whole season as AM B???? I mean look at method played 1 event as novice, then only played 2 more and entered the last one as AM. Or zone played one event as novice and have moved up straight away. Joz Kidz, now AM A.

In my opinion they cant be placed in the top 5 as they play AM B and have not won any events they have entered in the series.

Hold on on sec mate , think how many good teams there is in england ? alot isnt there ...!!!

Right Now think how many teams there is in Ireland , There is only 2 teams !!!

We only said that because out of all the things we dont have in Ireland i think we have done quite well ....:rolleyes:


Ps. Get The Facts right First


Paddy:mad:
 

weedave

#0
Jan 16, 2002
1,657
3
63
Belfast
Originally posted by spurs01
Your team has been around for quite a while yeah?? How come they played a whole season as AM B???? I mean look at method played 1 event as novice, then only played 2 more and entered the last one as AM. Or zone played one event as novice and have moved up straight away. Joz Kidz, now AM A.
Method Shouldn't of Been either Novice or Am B in the first place and they intended on playing Am B at campaign but were forced/told to move up by Niall.

And what is the point of starting the Millennium series for 2003 in Am B, playing 1 or 2 then moving to Am A? If they did that they wouldnt of been ranked well at all in either Am B or Am A.

And as The New Paddy stated, we only did rank them because of what they have achieved while barely getting to play tournaments.

Dave
 
D

duffistuta

Guest
People can nominate who they want.

Other people can argue about it.

However, if this degenerates into 'Escaramouche should be in top 5/no they shouldn't/yes they should' I will delete it purely on the grounds of it being ****ing boring for the rest of us, 'k?

k.

:p
 

weedave

#0
Jan 16, 2002
1,657
3
63
Belfast
Originally posted by duffistuta
People can nominate who they want.

Other people can argue about it.

However, if this degenerates into 'Escaramouche should be in top 5/no they shouldn't/yes they should' I will delete it purely on the grounds of it being ****ing boring for the rest of us, 'k?

k.

:p
No Problems Duff. Didn't aim for this to turn into a debate, was just putting across my reasons on why i did nominate them.

;)

Dave
 
Oct 28, 2003
559
0
0
south central bookham
well

there were a new (ish) team at the begining of this season.

so they started at the bottom.

then they went up to am b

now they have picked up players and have a solid roster

expect to see big things this year

kyle
 
J

Johan

Guest
Originally posted by sjt19
Backlash and DOA Zealots have folded dude.

All gone their seperate ways.

Have fun in Div 1 next year MacD, its gonna be far harder than you think.:eek: Maybe as you have only been around a a team for a year you should set your sights a little lower and gain some experience? There is a difference between playing at a high level and being the whipping boys of a catagory. No disrespect intended but I dont think you would have much success against th likes of Cyclone, Powertrip, Syndicate, Scalp, Hellwood, Taz, Joy Kids, Malera, Consilleium Dei, Vision, Millennium, Doriane Golak, Evil Factory, Paintballgateway etc.....

In many respects, playing Am A is actually harder than playing Pro, due to the number of quality teams you have to play.

In Sweden we had to play:

Dynasty, Ugly Ducklings, Malera, Taz, Scalp, Hellwood, Syndicate and Cyclone :eek:

Sam Backlash and Extacy IS HYBRID!!!!!!even better!!!!
 

sjt19

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2002
3,070
0
61
Visit site
Originally posted by Bolter
sjt19 if you put up a post and then want to discuss/argue about it for flunks sake put discuss in the thread title please.
Why? Do you need to be told to discuss something?:rolleyes:

Originally posted by Nick Brocolli dwarf

I thought the FIELD DESIGN was the reason ?
Reason for what dude?? We made semis, and came 8th.:confused: If your getting at the us playing hard teams being the reason i didnt enjoy Sweden then your way off the mark! I loved played those games, playing the best is fun! Sweden was my least favorite MS for other reasons not to be debated on here